If you look at the s p 500, you will see what looks like some swings, but you are talking about narrowing of the index here. Drop of volume going into the holiday weekend. We are not seeing that much on the big scale. Material stocks are down as a group. Financials as well. Defensive groups are doing better today. That is the push and pull we are sector level. On the individual level, stocks facebook is higher as is apple and costco. Companyising after the came out with earnings that beat estimates. Antiscience yellen, regarding what they are expecting in that event . Uptake uptick in bond yields. We heard was seemed to indicate the fed clearly saying the market is not pricing in as many increases as could happen. That is at least taking a pause going to her talk tomorrow. A little drop in the yield. Futures, Interest Rate we see a little bit of a drop. Big upward move. Similar movement there. 1 . S down by one quarter of the recent trend has been up in yields. Mark crumpton has more f
Deadlines delay or that each state has a different deadlines and list of registrants on the exchange may not match the list the governments have. Ultimately the cost is going up and you will pay the price. Here to break it all down, a Weekly Standard editor and fox Business Correspondent rich edson. Daniel, i want to start with you. We get some different numbers when we talk about enrollees for the Affordable Care act, obamacare. Whats the real number . Just because you enroll doesnt mean you have bought insurance, right . Thats right. The real number is when you first pay for your premium. That is when you have insurance. Just like anything else youre getting covered for, anything else that youre purchasing. You dope have it until you pay for it. So until you have made the first payment i dont believe you have Health Insurance. Adam so do we have any numbers, rich, who actually made those payments and how many people we need to make those payments to make the system work as intended .
It seems to me that a president ial campaign using a law firm as a conduit to pay for activities with which the campaign it itself doesnt want to be directly associated, is more than just dirty politics. Its also quite possibly illegal. To me, it seems that this is at least the violation of Campaign Finance laws for failure to accurately disclose the actual recipients of campaign dispersements. However this type of arrangement is not illegal. If its not illegal under current law i fear were risking opening pandoras box with all sorts of underhanded activities which campaigns being laundered through law firms and shielded und und under Attorney Client privilege. Do you share a similar concern and in your opinion is it legal under current law for a president ial campaign to hide its funding of the com pilation and dissemination of political dirt on its opponent by using a law firm to directly pay for the work . I would think that those matters are worthy of consideration, but as to the d
Im not and never was a prosecutor, but i did some criminal defense work back in the day when i practiced law for almost 20 years. It seems to me a president ial campaign using a law firm as a conduit to pay for activities the campaign itself doesnt want to be associated is more than just dirty politics. Its also possibly illegal. To accurately disclose the recipients of campaign dispersements. However, this type of arrangement is not illegal. If its not illegal under current law, i fear were risking opening pandoras box with all sorts of underhanded activities by campaigns being laundered through law firms and shielded under Attorney Client privilege. As the chief Law Enforcement official in this country, do you share similar concerns . And in your opinion, is it legal under current law for a president ial campaign to hide its funding of the compilation and dissemination of political dirt on its opponent by using the law firm to directly pay for the work . I would think its worthy of c