You know the 1st study but it does the same thing. It does there were met in felt that he was being targeted by the new s. P. D. Government. Chief of staff. Proposed a series of b. M. D. Reforms but at the same time he refused to hand over files to prosecutors who were investigating methods him to said that to do so would be detrimental to the interests of the government. In november 1975 met in stood trial in bonn on charges of violating west german export laws particularly in connection with weapon sales to India Pakistan and saudi arabia. Matins is seen here on the right along with some of his merits codefendants no charges were filed against anyone from the b. M. D. In November 1905 the court ruling from this mobile phone for mertens was acquitted on the charge of violating export laws his attorneys convinced the court that the
weapons sales have been made on behalf of the b n d that was bad news for the agency that. We visited the north rhinewestphalia State Archive and to a sport
weapons sales have been made on behalf of the b n d that was bad news for the agency that. we visited the north rhine-westphalia state archive and to a sport where a copy of the verdict is stored. unlike the regional court in bonn it considered it important to keep it. we weren t allowed to take pictures of the actual documents just the covers of the files but we were permitted to quote from the documents matins was acquitted because the weapons exports were approved by the b.m.d. and he was convinced they were legal because. the b.m.d. received requests from individual states and enabled contractual agreements. to b.m.d. took steps to provide financing options for merrick s eiji. the be a nice warm marriage representatives to secrecy. had to be in deep employer. it