shouldn t have. yeah, that s what i m thinking. a little too reckless to be in charge of everything. dawn piper has no regrets. she likes what trump s doing. at a restaurant, she tells me unpredictability can be a positive since it keeps opponents guessing. i think that it is a good thing to not know, you know, because sometimes the best defense is not knowing what the offense is. back at the gas station, i ask co-owner chris tolliver if he ever worries trump s words could go too far and maybe lead to war. that does worry me a little bit. the war part of it, because he does come across a little harsh sometimes. but like i said, he says what everyone else was probably thinking. the reason trump voters don t have a problem with how trump sees the world is because many of them see it the very same way. at the end of these interviews, i always ask one last question, which is would they vote for president trump again. and lately, i have been noticing a trend.
reporter: dawn piper has no regrets. she likes what trump s doing. at a restaurant, she tells me unpredictability can be a positive since it keeps opponents guessing. and i think that it is a good thing to not know, you know, because sometimes the best defense is not knowing what the offense is. reporter: back at the gas station, i asked owner chris if he ever worries that trump s words could go too far and maybe lead to war. that does worry me a little bit, the war part of it, he does come across a little harsh sometimes, but like i said, he says what everyone else was probably thinking, you know? reporter: the reason trump voters don t have a problem with how trump sees the world is because many of them see it the very same way. erin, as i always do, i finished by asking the voters if they would vote for president trump again. lately i ve been noticing a trend. the answer is still yes, but then some voters say that could
united states. we need to be aggressive. what i m saying is we have to be aggressive in the correct way so we can avoid these sorts of casualties and be effective in defeating the terrorists. david, when you look at the precedent here, though we know that these kind of tragic casualties, what is technically sometimes referred to as friendly fire or collateral damage, this is part of war part of why war is terrible. the drone dynamic has a technological difference and a legal difference. we ve seen that in the memoranda that will come out we ll talk about that later in the show. do you think the administration s handled this the right way? should it be any different in your mind substantively because it was a drone attack or is this a standard problem that they have to month in the standard way have to manage in a standard way? i don t think there s ever a war that didn t have collateral damage. i think a lot of effort are being undertaken in this to reduce the risk. i think the p
about immigration. at least back on the table. a long bunch of days in front of us. who knows what could happen with lab are are a dor or anybody else. how could they seize leverage from cantor s loss? a tea party resurgence. democrats will seize this by not doing anything. they will let it play out and hope it causes a bunch of problems for republicans. republicans know that s what s happening. they will seek to make this as small a civil war as they can manage. and try to avoid the war part of it. as much as they can. that will be the tack democrats will take. not to exploit this by doing something but exploit it by letting it play out and seeing where it goes. what could they do though if they were to do? democrats can t do a lot other than point out how much it shows republicans, there is
reince priebus. his party earned the label of war on women because of things like restricting access to contraception and opposing equal pay for equal work and going hog wild against abortion rights. not because of the substance of it but because comparing women to caterpillars is not an awesome way to convince women how much respect you have for them. so that was thank you. strike one. then they gave it another shot. not the chairman of the republican party but the spokesman for the republican party, sean spicer. remember that name. it s coming back. he said it s not the women part of the phrase but the war part. he said it s borderline unpatriotic for anyone to use war as a political metaphor. and, yes, mr. spicer is the spokesman for the republican party. that s their website right