gi lyes at rsk, we have to think before we act. i think if i can think of one thing that is true in that mass that i think is on incontinue ro veritable and hard for anybody to object to is every time we toppled a strong man, we have gotten chaos, and we have gotten the rise of radical islam. that includes wars that were promoted by republicans as well as wars promoted by democrats. i think hillary s war in libya is an example. i also think the toppling of hussein is another example of when a strong man went, chaos ensued. do you think we re spending too much time debating iran and not enough time debating the isis resolution that congress hasn t voted on. i think they re both important. i think they both need to involve congress. the our founding fathers were very, very specific that congress had a role in foreign policy, a big role. in fact, they gave the ultimate role, you know in declaring war to congress. and that was intentional. to make it difficult, and to make it that we
the iran deal, i know there is confusion, the iranians saying one thing about it, the americans saying one thing about it. assuming the deal is what john kerry and president obama are saying, is that a deal you would nullify on day one if you took office? i think that s the real problem is assuming what it actually means. i talked to the administration about this. my concern has been, and i told them from the beginning, one of my biggest concerns is the day the obama administration came out with their fact sheet on what the agreement would mean, the foreign minister of iran comes out tweeting in english and says, well, no, it means exactly the opposite of what the americans mean. you have to question the sincerity of the iranians and it goes to credibility on this agreement. is this really going to be an agreement that we can whole heartedly get behind. going back to the description, the agreement is the united states described it, good enough agreement for you? i think there a
comfortable bringing up a lot of her past. a lot of bill clinton s past. and saying it should be thought about and debated. you re hesitant about your past, you don t like your associations with your father being a part of your campaign. right. isn t that a little hypocritical? i think the thing is about the clintons there s a certain sense that they think they re above the law. and i think there s this grand hypocrisy for the clintons in the sense that we ve got this whole thing, this war on women thing that they like to talk about. and yet hillary clinton has taken money from countries that rape victims are publicly lashed. in saudi arabia a woman was gang-raped by seven men, she was publicly lashed 90 times and she was convicted of being in the car with an unmarried man. we should be boycotting, voluntarily boycotting a country, not buying stuff from a country so you want to boycott if you re president, saudi arabia, you re no longer an ally. you re done. that s a li
reserved for men? is that what they re saying? that s what he s positing. and there was an article that ted cruz, after his launch on monday, is ambitious. and ted cruz is ambitious. no one running for president isn t going to be ambitious. there is no doubt that hillary does get the short end of the stick sometimes. people come after her. is that what s going on here they blow the dog whistle and all these splinter groups say we re going to do this war on women thing and hillary is going to be the savior you say this war on women thing like it s not real or women are earning equal amounts to men. oh, here we go. oh wow. how is hillary doing on the war on women. if we re going to use jessica s litmus test? okay, it is true that sometimes female politicians face sexist attacks. hillary in 2007 a female reporter with the washington post no right wing rag, did a story about hillary clinton s cleavage while she was a senator. but sarah palin also was
to pick winners and losers. i can t talk about policies because they support her. she believes that way. reporter: democrats say they are protecting the environment and if a war is being waged, it s on women by republicans with conservative social policies. she voted five times against equal pay. so for west virginians, women who still only make 70 cents for every dollar a man makes, i m standing up for women and her fact she s voted five times against women is very clear. the war on women thing is a day ver jant from the real issue which is jobs and the economy. i m not waging a war on myself either. reporter: democrats are spending tens of millions of dollars across the country advance i advancing the notion that the republican party is waging a war on women. it s a tough sell to make here when of the two women running for the u.s. senate, it s the republican who leads the polls.