lawyers, immigration lawyers, more questions certainly have arisen tonight as a result of this small victory as you have described it. it s not a small victory. it s a partial victory. it means nobody is in danger of being deported. what might be the compromise to your criticism of what president trump has done? i don t know that there is a compromise. there are two different issues here. actually, two different issues. issue number one is the constitutionality and legality and intelligence or stupidity of the entire order. we think it s unconstitutional, it s illegal and it s also stupid because it s not going to protect our country from desperate people who basically, some of homicidwhom sided with the war on iraq and suffered with us in iraq and all of whom were carefully vetted over a period of up to two years and given visas. the second issue is even if you are going to issue an order like this, make it effective for
retake the city of ramadi. this is an important thing for the american people to understand. these forces do not have a combat mission. reporter: white house officials maintain this won t be a repeat of the war on iraq in 2003. but more like the raid u.s. forces joined last week to rescue iraqi hostages and administration is not ruling out future deployments. it is possible there could be further deployments. well, jim, i don t want to try to predict the future. reporter: despite repeated promises from mr. obama u.s. forces won t be engaged in combat. i will not put american boots on the ground in syria. i will not pursue an open-ended action like iraq or afghanistan. with respect to the situation on the ground in syria, we will not be placing the u.s. ground
and invest banks and large insurance companies being together. you do not have six financial institutions having assets equivalent to 60% of the gdp. with all the economic and political power that these have i think you have to break them up. that s been my view for a long time. that is not hillary clinton s view. i believe that nafta and permanent normal trade relations, trade agreements have been a disaster for american workers over the last 15 years we ve lots tens of millions of factories and decent paying job. the transpacific partnership was a bad agreement. i didn t have to do a lot of thinking about it. keystone pipeline the same thing. war on iraq the same thing. i have been consistent over the years. i think it s point for the people to know that. and one of the issues you drew a contrast with on hillary clinton last night had to do
name-calling, and the attacks at a personal level, but exploration of where they differ on the issues and where where they are the same on the issues. i think that for the most part see the direction of the country consistent is si, i will, a nd they know that we have to consistently, and they know that we have to do better by the middle-class, and get the wages growing again, and make sure that everyone has health care, and college is affordable, but there are difference, and they will be explored tonight, but it is not a debate of name calling, but substantive. well, it is not name calling, but they will point out, presumably bernie sanders that she voted for the war on iraq, and bernie sanders voted against it. that strategy worked well for barack obama when he was running against her in 2008. wellers it is a long time ago, and barack obama won that election and felt that she was
just stand there and let him shoot me, i would say hey, guys, let s attack him, he can t get us all. martha: a fascinating response in the meantime if he slow candidate donald trump sat down with bret baier and he responded to a lot of questions including a war on iraq and eminent domain. the number one way we are getting hurt is currency manipulation. china and japan do it brilliantly. we don t do it because we don t have a clue what we are doing. what kind of deal would you make with putin if you look at ukraine or syria. i think it s important for