u.s. commit? i m not the commander in chief, and i m not in that line of decision making. but i think he s correct not to rule anything out. that s been that has been a process, that s been a position that presidents down through the decades have taken on both sides of the aisle, and i think the president is correct to not take any action off the table. he says there is something that will happen over the next 24 to 48 hours. we shall see. senator wicker, thanks so much for joining us. thanks, wolf. it s his first day on the job as the president s national security adviser, to what advice is john bolton giving president trump after years of being known as a war hog. the president references e china with a possible trade war. he doesn t know if that s actually going to happen.
there s reporting that john kelly opposed the choice of john bolton as national security advisor. we know john kelly blocked the access of john bolton. so it looks like this choice of bolton could be the beginning of the counting of the days for john kelly. i think we learned over the past couple days, when sarah sanders goes out and says the president thinks you re doing a great job, it s time to brush up your linked in profile. i have a lot of disagreements with john kelly on matters of domestic policy in particular. but we have to give him this, he is a military man who understands the huge cost, human cost of war. he s not a war hog. i think seeing john bolton come into the white house with his proposals for a pre-emptive strike with north korea, war with iran, and he wrote about war with cuba. this is a person who s going to
day. there s reporting that john kelly opposed tohe choice of jon bolton as national security advisor. we know john kelly blocked the access of john bolton. so it looks like this choice of bolton could be the beginning of the counting of the days for john kelly. i think we learned over the past couple days, when sarah sanders goes out and says the president thinks you re doing a great job, it s time to brush up your linked in profile. i have a lot of disagreements with john kelly on matters of domestic policy in particular. but we have to give him this, he is a military man who understands the huge cost, human cost of war. he s not a war hog. i think seeing john bolton come into the white house with his proposals for a pre-emptive strike with north korea, war with iran, and he wrote about
crazy. we cannot placate them. america does not have the stomach for a long war. is that still true. and let s pay the money. we don t have the money. plus, what s the rest of the world going to say? so jefferson was not known as a war hog. he fought in the revolutionary war and didn t do it. said we ve got to stand up. when jefferson gets the job, he knows he s not making the payments and he takes them on. he does. four years. congress is against them for a while. the people are saying why do we want the war against these barbarians but it was jefferson that stuck to it, adjusted his war plan and with the victory. truly remarkable. the patriotism and the fact that the story i love, of course, the one where they actually march from egypt into the port of dirn with mercenaries used to help them along the way. incredible effort. 500 miles.
impression you get from the media, pentagon plans to change army to preworld war ii levels from new york times , a report from fox news. army would shimplg by 80,000 troops, 8 tep war hog would be retired. and u2 spy plane replaced by an unmanned vehicle, the new face of the trim down military. john: it thank you not mean they will spend less, secretary of deficient said today s military can fight with fewer people, technology does more. you are equipped to do how you are led, the equipment that you have, the modernization that technology, versus what our army looked like in 1939, there is no comparison. john: so, fewer troops, if congress approves, former congressman ron paul, now host of ron paul channel said that is