trump would not say which side he wants to win in that conflict. in that sense, his positions are outliers, even within his own party. republican challenger it comes at a time, jim, just before you go, when north korea is claiming that they ve miniaturized nuclear warheads. i mean yeah. the moment. yeah, it is. i mean, we can t not pay attention to what s happening in north korea. there s so much for focus at home. and i get it, because you ve got russia in ukraine, you ve got tensions with china. north korea, for years, presidents of both parties in this country said they would not allow a nuclear north korea. north korea is nuclear today. it has nuclear weapons and it has missiles capable of carrying those nuclear weapons, and as they advance, make them smaller, that means, sadly, it s the prospect of being able to fit more war heads on the top of one weapon, makes it harder to defend against. that is a dangerous place to be. but that s the reality we re living in today
Arrest Of The Person Responsible For Pentagon Documents Leak - Windermere Sun-For Healthier/Happier/More Sustainable Living
windermeresun.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from windermeresun.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
chris jones calls these materialized uavs dumb bombs. this particular drone we ve been looking at would be much more effective if it had a decent camera in it. reporter: the former british officer who specialized in drone warfare says he expected more from a military super power like russia. this seems to be a very crude, unsophisticated, not very tech logically advanced way of conducting operation. it s fascinating,iven. the so-called dumb bombs are not being used obviously in the war. they carry much larger war heads and have done substantial damage in the past. there s been some analysis on them and kind of the components that are used to direct them, many of them coming from the u.s. and other western countries. they re just one of the many drones in the sky out here. in the beginning of the war the
in the new treaty. because that treaty expires in three years. ask is there s almost no chance that there s going to be a negotiation to extend it. there will be no limits on either country s nuclear forces. what is the strategic value for russia in suspending their participation in this treaty. are they now free to engage in expanding their arsenal? any putting the genie back in the bottle if that happens? that s the big problem. and i think i m very concerned that they might not be able to be put back in the bottle at this point. so what the russians want to do is they could potentially be able to use this lack of limits. they have a little less than 6,000 war heads right now this their nuclear arsenal. they could expand that number and they could also develop newer weapons. we talked about the hypersonic weapons capability.
main population centers, but it s a step in the right direction. unfortunately wave been drip, drip, dripping in this war. i would prefer we go straight to a large number. we have them, we can give them. state department is concerned about escalation, very valid claim. but this is defensive weapon only going to attack inbound aircraft and inbound rockets. so pilots and the russian pilots are not going to be able to hide anymore. there s a certain point where if you re going to do it and they say it s the end of the world if you do it, just do it. don t do one of them and be like there s a difference between one and two. you re saying they need at least eight of those. you ve talked a lot about cluster munition war heads and why you believe those make a lot of sense, even though they re frowned upon by much of the world the u.s. has a lot of them, and you think ukraine should have them. you were on this show six weeks ago when they submitted the actual request. so where do things stan
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.