history. as we all know why do people ignore this? he was not some crazy neocon hawk who kept invading countries. he signed the peace treat with gorbachev the minute he knew it could be done. he wanted to end the damn thing. he hated mutual destruction, hated nuclear weapons and it s all in the record if anybody wants to see it. again, there is a difference between reagan when he had responsibility and when he was just out there hawking columns and radio commentaries, a big difference. how do we end up with a conservative movement now that has fully embraced the guy on that 78 rpm record, fully embraced the ideologue but not the governor? because we all embrace the winner. look at the various variations of christianity, just to take a much larger notion. there s 1,000 different versions of what christianity stands for. does it stand for constantine and war enhoc signo vinces or for peace and love? people find different ways to use an iconic person like reagan. are you, in writ
ignore this? he was not some crazy neocon hawk who kept invading countries. he signed the peace treat with gorbachev the minute he knew it could be done. he wanted to end the damn thing. he hated mutual destruction, hated nuclear weapons and it s all in the record if anybody wants to see it. again, there is a difference between reagan when he had responsibility and when he was just out there hawking columns and radio commentaries, a big difference. how do we end up with a conservative movement now that has fully embraced the guy on that 78 rpm record, fully embraced the ideologue but not the governor? because we all embrace the winner. look at the various variations of christianity, just to take a much larger notion. there s 1,000 different versions of what christianity stands for. does it stand for constantine and war enhoc signo vinces or for peace and love? people find different ways to use an iconic person like reagan. are you, in writing about his
really made his place in history. as we all know why do people ignore this? he was not some crazy neocon hawk who kept invading countries. he signed the peace treat with gorbachev the minute he knew it could be done. he wanted to end the damn thing. he hated mutual destruction, hated nuclear weapons and it s all in the record if anybody wants to see it. again, there is a difference between reagan when he had responsibility and when he was just out there hawking columns and radio commentaries, a big difference. how do we end up with a conservative movement now that has fully embraced the guy on that 78 rpm record, fully embraced the ideologue but not the governor? because we all embrace the winner. look at the various variations of christianity, just to take a much larger notion. there s 1,000 different versions of what christianity stands for. does it stand for constantine and war enhoc signo vinces or for peace and love? people find different ways to use an iconic person like r