Cambodia and louse. The resolution was passed after that. It was vetoed by the president nixon the veto was overridden but no president has concede it had constitutionality of it for a series of reasons and there are probably some problems of the bill that make it unconstitutional. So we have put forward a repeal and replace of that resolution that basically does three things. It tries to define and this is pretty tough what is war. Its not state v. State any more of nonstate actors, cyber attacks, drone attacks, what is war that would trigger the executive legislative interaction. Second tries to define and system ties consultation. Youve heard president s say ive consulted with congress on this. I read in the paper the president was consulting with congress. I know im 95th in seniority but im on these can hes and knows called me. So it can be as much or as little as the president calling a few people that he thinks will agree with him or talking to the leadership or talking to the me
Theyre down there, i went to the wrong room. Theyre there. Well theres more. They were there an hour ago, two hours ago. So you found another spot theyre hiding them. Yeah. Excellent. So gentlemen. Thats so they can have the penthouse office for the director. So gentlemen what are we going to do about this . [inaudible] we can say all we want about stand together. We dont have the money to fight it. We dont most people dont have the energy to even stand up here. I spent two fridays helping two different sets of vets and their families, and its not the first time ive done it. But these are the most recent. And they cant get help by anybody in this facility. [inaudible] staff at these meetings. [applause] fellow veterans, everyone in this room here is a veteran or veterans advocate. Mr. Coats, coaty. Cozzdi. Excuse me. Ive been involved in this hospital since 1973 when i was released from Walter Reed Army hospital after 14 months. I received three battle wounds, three purple hearts. I ha
Savannah is about 20 minutes and includes the unveiling of a New Historical marker about the march to the sea. Good afternoon. Im bob jepsen, chairman of the Georgia Historical Society and id like to welcome you all to Madison Square on this warm and balmy day. Im taking a big risk, we believe that the bells are finished for awhile, so i hope you can hear me. Part of t me add my welcome to this Historical Marker dedication commemorating the 150th anniversary of the end of the march to the sea. One of the bestknown, but most controversial, and i would hasten to add, misunderstood, aspects of the american civil war. The marker we dedicate today is one of 25 markers installed by the Georgia Historical Society and our partners, over the last five years as a part of the civil war 150 Historical Marker project. A Public Education and heritage tourism initiative, launched by the Georgia Historical Society to help georgias and visitors to our state gain a better understanding of the cataclysmi
Savannah completing the march to , the sea campaign that started in atlanta five weeks earlier. Todd gross of the Georgia Historical Society talks about the significance of the campaign and how it has been remembered. This ceremony in savannah is about 20 minutes and includes the unveiling of a Historical Marker. Good afternoon. Im bob jepsen, chairman of the Georgia Historical Society and id like to welcome you all to Madison Square on this warm and balmy day. Im taking a big risk, we believe that the bells are finished for awhile, so i hope you can hear me. Part of our mission at the Georgia Historical Society is the education of the history of the great state of georgia, and were here today to dedicate a marker that represents an event, people, and a time in our history. And to get on with the program id like to introduce the president of the historical society, dr. Todd gross. Todd . Thank you, bob. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Well, thank you, bob. And good afternoon, everyone. Let
Need to leave. Any comments on that. Steve, do you want to start . Sure, i can address that. I do not think shifting to a territorial system is right. The two problems that weve highlighted here are earning stripping and the deferred accumulated earnings of these controlled foreign corporations. If we shift to a territorial system in which a u. S. Company is only taxed on its u. S. Source income, and not taxed on its foreign income, there will be all the more incentive for multinationals to strip income from the u. S. Base and shift it abroad. Isnt that the first step and then you deal with all those issues let me finish my answer. So as part of any consideration of territorial, we need to address the earnings stripping issues that were discussing here. One of the observations professor shay made in his article, he wanted treasury to adopt regulations that could fold into tax reform and weve got to address earning stripping and we have to do it sensibly and i think we could fold that i