this year. since then, the former president has made no secret for his plans of revenge if he wins a second term in november, including in an interview aired just last night. they have done indictments in order to win an election. they call it weaponization. and the people aren t going to stand for it. yeah, they have done something that allows the next party. if i happen to be president, and i see somebody who s doing well and beating me very badly, i say, go down and indict them. mostly that would be, you know, they would be out of business. they d be out. they d be out of the election. so this is not the first time that we ve heard that a victorious president-elect trump would do things differently the second time around. the new york times recently reporting on how allies of the former president are preparing to pack the white house with aggressive right wing lawyers who would be less likely to stand in the way of his agenda, which was a frustration of his during hi
everyone. i m laura ingraham. this is the ingraham angle. well, well, well, trump s gag is off. in one case and at least temply. this is after a federal allweleyn pat court stepped. in i m going to explain this later. but, first, hateful, peacemakers that s the focus of tonight s angle. laura: the rule is that you don t negotiate with terrorists, right? you don t give them an inch because they will take a mile. in the case of hamas, we know they will use a lull in the fights to burrow, in resupply, and stoke more anti-israel sentiment worldwide. to survive, hamas needs a break in the action. they know it, and hezbollah knows it. the first objective we have to work on 24/7 is an end to aggression against gaza, an end of war against gaza. the second objective is victory for gaza. victory for the palestinian resistance in gaza. and for hamas in particular to be victorious in gaza. laura: now, remember, their goal is to destroy israel, period. and they will use endless pr
israel and the war in gaza. and what i ve learned from speaking deeply with my constituents back home is that most of my constituents support israel, they support israel as a sovereign jewish state. they want to make sure it is safe and secure. and they also cannot stomach what has been happening in netanyahu s war against gaza. so we had to hold both things, and i felt strongly that, okaying offensive military aid right now would be essentially to greenlight what would be happening in. netanyahu has not been secret about his plans to invade rafah. we know that there s over 1 million palestinians sheltering there . and i didn t feel like it was an opportunity for us to give voice to what so many americans are feeling right now. they want the united states to push israel towards peace, and although we also made a strong
statements, coupling their yes vote with a very strong statements about what we cannot see any longer. i cannot express to you the number of people who had said this to us. we know that we are 37 who were willing to go on the record. there are many more that are not at all happy with the way netanyahu has been conducting this war. many, many civilians, obviously, have died, but also, there is horrible suffering going on right now in gaza, and we do not feel that netanyahu and his government has done enough to get aid through. you use the word course correction, and trying to get the prime minister of israel to avoid what is happening in gaza and change course there. you and your colleagues have also said that you hope this sends a message to our president, president biden, to change course. we ve seen a wave of uncommitted voters also trying to accomplish that goal
throughout the democratic primary season. talk to us about that, and what you would like to see from the president, and what message this vote today, although it passed, this block of voters who said no, what message does this send to the president from the democratic caucus and also from a general election perspective? what i think the message is, and should be, is that we as members of congress are taking our role, both as the, the people who hold the purse strings and the folks who are representing our constituents, we are taking those roles seriously to say that what americans are expressing right now is an incredible frustration and anger at the way the war is being conducted, and that we have a voice that we had to use. now, that being said, i also want to be really clear. we are also a strong voice to say if you are not happy with the way things are going in gaza, if you are not happy with the leadership in israel, the