but this committee with the information that we have, have not been in a position to fill in those gaps. i would say specifically to answer your question, let s talk about the many requests for diplomatic security that were ignored or turned down. those are the questions that this committee that s just one example of how we need to fill in these missing pieces. right. of course as you know, the former secretary addressed those threats, addressed them in a regional context, address them in a specific contest. you could say context, that she took responsibility, she didn t take blame. i understand how that could upset you politically but in terms of what information there is yet to be found, it raises questions. of what else is there? well, again, this isn t solely about mrs. clinton. this isn t solely about secretary clinton. she s just one piece of a much larger investigation. we ve interviewed over 50 witnesses. by the time we re done with this
four americans that unnecessarily lost their lives. there are missing pieces. there are gaps. which is why this select committee was created in the first place, so we could fill in the gaps. there s no question that lives were lost, that there s accountability to be had. you get to the legitimate questions of what else are you going to learn? you had the secretary, former secretary now, for over six hours. she spoke specifically to what she knew before, during and after. she gave you answers that may not have been satisfying to you but she gave answers. she talked to you about the threat. she talked to you about her recognition of the threat. she talked to you about her response to the threat. what areas, specifically, are you looking at? well, first of all, there s been a lot of stone walling when it comes to providing this committee with the appropriate information we need to ask the right questions. we have been pushing for some time now to have access to the documents that we b
mouth that we re blaming the police. we want information. absolutely. we don t want to rely solely on the police officer who shot him in the middle of the night. absolutely. we want the information to come out. that s not how you originally put it. all of us want information. that s why we re having this conversation because we care about what happens. let me repeat how i answered your question. yes. you asked me, you said, there s not much known about this situation. i said there isn t much known about this situatin. but what we don t want to do is have to rely solely on the person who killed corey jones. his family knows corey jones. his community knows corey jones. they know his character. there is nothing in his history that would suggest in any way that he would kill a police officer. that was a god faring man, a god loving man who was inspirational to everyone he came in contact
to your question is what may we have learned? well, i would say to you and everybody watching, stay tune, please watch the interview tomorrow with secretary clinton because i believe that you will see that there are documents that we will be able to ask her questions about for the first time. that s very important to be able to fill in the gaps about the information that we currently do not have. what can you suggest that may come up tomorrow that will expose that the secretary has been untruthful with you or that the administration manufactured a cover-up? because those would be the only two real areas that would justify this extension of curiosity and expense of this committee, wouldn t it? i disagree with the premise of your question. you re suggesting that the only existence for this committee is to expose something that hillary clinton did wrong. that s or the administration. that s absolutely incorrect. or the administration. our job is to find out the whole truth a
just like he had got off the phone with his brother a few minutes ago, just waiting. there is no reason he should be dead. and this is a situation that cries out for answers. it cries out for transparency. it cries out for the police to give this family information. give this community information. all of those things at this point, should be taken as true. the gun was purchased a few days earlier. we don t know why. you say for protection. woe done know if there was a specific threat feared. there s a lot of information that needs to come out. all i m saying is, why tilt the scales about what to believ and not. chris cuomo, who s telling the no, no, chris, his family isn t tilting the scales. nobody s tilting the scales. we want ans. we don t want it to be swept under the rug. absolutely understood. nobody is tilting the scales. all we re asking for is information. don t try to put words in my