sometimes it is the way the city operates. the efforts that are going on here today, we have an effort since 2008. it is something that we are very proud of. we can t do it alone. we have to educate new generations of people to recognize the value of our trees. there ll be other generations, i will thank all of you for coming up on arbor day. we will thank our sponsors as well. in recognition of that, in recognition of this movement and being part of an international movement, we are recognizing today that we are planting a tree for a woman that does not with us now, but her spirit as a former recipient of the golden environmental prize in san francisco, a nobel laureate, as someone that we honor today of who started from the country of kenya and worked very hard with organizations throughout the world to start a movement to be sensitive to our environment. that is 47 million trees during her lifetime that were planted across the world. today, we have the honor of declaring t
good afternoon petraeus i am hearing to present i was told over the weekend, no, i would go present and entered as the person who will be receiving the award this year. i said, when is that coming at the lunch? the end, the grand finale? she said, no, it is the first award. i said, isn t this the international women s day and we re giving a man the first award? she said, oh, they have to go back to work. i said, we have heard that before. so the man of the year. when we think about who the right person should be and is deserving of such an honor, believe me, we re not looking for a man who is in high political office or the ceo of the major companies. instead, we re looking for someone who has demonstrated over time that he is committed to advancing equal rights and opportunities for women and minorities, someone who has talked the talk and walked the walk. i know we have a number of guests from other countries at this year s women s summit. and at many l
this effort? realizing we have got a lot more work to do. and to say to you that if you do not continue advocating, if we do not have opportunities for you to speak out enough for us to listen and to absorb and to integrate into our policies, then you are god have voices of their that suggest then you re going to have voices out there that suggest that the issues you bring out are private matters. that cannot be accepted in a city like san fran. like san francisco. [applause] i join recognizing international women s day. i personally thank you for this award and recognition. but i also want to make sure you re challenged and you are invited and you are encouraged to advocate with them and to this administration, because we will listen and we will act on it those things to make sure that we re more of an equal society and that we can provide perhaps leadership to other areas of the country that have yet to catch up. thank you very much. [applause] we are going to make a
disproportionately targeting the most vulnerable people in san francisco. the reason for that to is this emphasis on unmatched general fund. you have an elimination of affordable housing by raising the rents on people with aids. you have losses in the drop-in centers. you have hundreds and hundreds of homeless people that are relying on that for basic needs. you have cuts to case management in the shelters. we would like you to restore all of the cuts to the health department and try to increase funding. thank you. supervisor chu: thank you. good afternoon, budget and finance. there is something, but there is nothing. i have not seen a psychiatrist in years, and what does it do? there is no medical help. the cataract operation was great. they have done nothing else. i had all of these places to go. i do not know where they are. by the time you got that aids disease, you would go crazy. it is a silly thing. you have to be super gay that is what they want. i cannot go see a
written, there will not be a shortage when the trigger hits, we are changing the trigger so that it matches the mathematical intent. that is really it in a nutshell. you have before you what you already adopted with those two changes, which are simple to understand, and those are the technical changes. could you describe, procedurally, what happens if we adopt this, these changes in the legislation? the rules committee, likely will hear this on april 5 possibly late march. at that point, it goes back to the full board come first and second full of reading. our understanding is there is sufficient support that this would be adopted with the changes. we have sufficient confidence if we do not vote on the version that was sent to us by the board originally, but instead, vote on this version that was negotiated over the course of the last week, we are not running into any procedural problems? no, if the commission were to adopt these last set of changes the direct