A senator are we in a quorum call . The presiding officer no, we are not. A senator thank you, madam president. I rise today because its my honor to introduce my colleague who actually needs no introduction but still for this speech today. Mr. Hoeven i have the pleasure to introduce kevin cramer who will be thriferring his delivering his official maiden speech to the senate. Ive known kevin for many years. Hes always been incredibly diligent worker for the people of north dakota. And he served our state in many different capacities. He served as tourism director and did a tremendous job promoting our state, promoting tourism, and really promoting the beauty and the history of our state in a way that brought a lot of National Attention and really made a difference in terms of tourism for our state. He also served our state as Economic Development director, something that is certainly near and dear to my heart. Ive always believed that job creations are job one. To me thats the engine th
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions