want a waush with me in wall street or washington, that s fine. you endanger my children. pan what do you say, the rising protests in new jersey, and we ve seen more of this. are you worried about that? yeah, i mean, we should point out that the protests aren t just protesters for higher taxes if, you listen to the rhetoric, they re barely discernible if you can stand the smell of them socialist marxist ideology, calling for the end of the system not to help repair the system and the other thing this, i have about a dozen sources who used to work, these are investment people, used to work for big investment firms or have their investment firms in california and new york and move to texas, why? taxes, and that s and why do you say they smell. these guys? because sources told the fox business network who go down there, you get within three inches of them your bea to throw up. neil: okay, adam, not on the throwup issue, but on the
party? evidently. and if it can get you elected, that is seemingly is all that matters, sean. won t they interpret it that way. if the wall street protests represented genuine frustration with wall street, the banks, this economy, where it is going, field some candidates, get people elected by the tea party did and affect the agenda of a party. i don t get the sense they can translate it. they don t have an agenda. everybody is america in frustrated at different levels but the tea party had a plan, the gop has a plan. occupy wallstreet does not have a plan. why don t they protest in front of the white house? it should be occupy pennsylvania avenue, in my mind. be mad at the government for giving the banks the money. or giving, supporting sub prime mortgages. i think it s a misplaced frustration. it s a hard, complicated argument to make and people are frustrated. people are frustrated and they are frustrated with the unemployment. last one.
party? evidently. and if it can get you elected, that is seemingly is all that matters, sean. won t they interpret it that way. if the wall street protests represented genuine frustration with wall street, the banks, this economy, where it is going, field some candidates, get people elected by the tea party did and affect the agenda of a party. i don t get the sense they can translate it. they don t have an agenda. everybody is america in frustrated at different levels but the tea party had a plan, the gop has a plan. occupy wallstreet does not have a plan. why don t they protest in front of the white house? it should be occupy pennsylvania avenue, in my mind. be mad at the government for giving the banks the money. or giving, supporting sub prime mortgages. i think it s a misplaced frustration. it s a hard, complicated argument to make and people are frustrated. people are frustrated and they are frustrated with the unemployment. last one.
the way, their solutions are just, there are no solutions. let me address that and finish my point. i agree with your point there s probably some revolutionaries. and some. if you look at history. this is now the protests work, the revolutionarieses are the ones who started the protests. no, they re in the system. it wasn t until the middle class college kids got involved that it started to have big numbers and attention. and the time change i just want to talk about the people leaving new york and this has been going on for decades, charlie. that s why people moved to and the ones left may go as well. okay, but the industry is in new york for a reason, and it s had one industry there. the big banks are in new york, some of them and talking about thousands and thousands of people that own investment firms that are opening up all over texas and austin, texas, i know that. neil: bottom line. i think there s a slow
you have to follow the court of law. remember what we re doing here, we re talking about wire tapping people not for murder, not for what do you make he could get out of this on get it all reversed? of course he could get off on technicality, the point is nothing whatsoever to do with the the wall street protests and the prosecutors have been trying to tamp down on people who cheat on wall street for years and this guy got the book thrown at him and no one should be upset except his family. i don t think they realized he was i don t think they know who raj is. if he gets off on this, and like i said, there is, i ve talked to a lot of lawyers, it s more than just they, not dotting an i and not crossing a t. it s major stuff. they did make a leap the way they got him. amelia, you re saying how would you feel if he does get off. as a small business owners we continue to say if you have