right. i think that introduction was brilliant. insofar as it really spells out what s at stake here. china not being in the top ten. we do have trade issues with china. they do dump aluminum and steel at below market prices. but this is such a broad sweeping set of tariffs that in the midst of nafta negotiations with canada and mexico, as you said, canada is the largest e s exporter of steel to the united states. as you suggested, led by peter navarro, who has really set china in their sights when it comes to this type of trade maneuver. yet china s not being target heard. the big worry on wall street isn t so much this is a singular item as that it could lead to what we called in the 1930s bigger thy neighbor trade policies with the tit-for-tat all around the world and that just weakens the global economy upon which the u.s. relies. it extended the great
he is so brilliant at changing the narrative to, oh, it s i had the right intentions but it s just the entrenched deep state, you know, this isn t well, it is national security but, you know, this is the entrenched global elites who are blocking him at every turn as he tries to make things better for the american worker. that i think is the political risk for people who oppose these policies. hot damn, that was a great conversation. all right, coming up, despite the tremendous outcry for new gun control legislation, senate majority leader mitch mcconnell apparently has bigger priorities. after a, quote, great, i love these, great dinner with the nra, could priorities change for the president as well? i might have to take president trump to dinner. he doesn t know what great dinners are. after the controversial tariff announcement, stephen colbert, he tried to make sense of it. it could make things like beer, cars and baseball bats more expensive. i mean, when i hear that, it
presidency. i think there s increased concern that what may be going well on wall street isn t necessarily translating to main street in some of the communities where you don t have large percentages of people invested in stocks or other traditional forms of wealth growth that the president champions. so we can t plan to bringing jobs back. there is not much evidence of that happen as quickly as quoters want. there will be some concern at the polls. president trump recently touted success and black unemployment being down. that is being used as a talking point in his speeches. let me ask you, if democrats do take the house and possibly even gain a senate seat or two, how likely are they to proceed with impeachment articles. is this something that could backfire on them? are they going to campaign on the issue that if they win they will impeach the president, or can that backfire? there are some districts where candidates are talking more about impeachment or even
it was legislated like so much other legislation, i think it will be positive for the economy and positive politically. kennedy: he s absolutely right because the economy is going in the right direction right now. the president if he doesn t talk about it enough that with wall street and unemployment gdp growth. harris: wall street isn t telling me that the economy is going well for the people on main street. it never has. and an evening that s part of the argument for republicans. i think it s kind of smart that they haven t leaned in the 65 times the debt has broken the record or something like that will close outside of territory were seen before. kennedy: except for working people who have 401(k) plans and other savings grade it really that is their paychecks. but the first 24,000 is without tax, people will feel that. if it goes away which has been around since 1914, people will feel that too. and what it may feel like to them that there was a movement of that money and to
enough. they ve been subsidizing this recovery. zero percent interest rates. that means the retiree earns zero on their savings in the bank so other groups can borrow that money but the wealth is created at the top. those rules need to change and there hasn t benefited the majority of americans. but subsidizing wall street won t fix the problem. nor demonizing wall street isn t going to solve the problem. taryn, lot of this frankly is a result of the federal reserve. it s also the result of an administration that has show no leadership and hasn t been able to bring consensus together on capitol hill. also the result of some concern about increased regulation and a lot of clarity out of this administration, but taryn, when you look at this wild gyration that we we re just seeing now the dow settled slightly in the red there today. when you look at the wild