in terms of the value of this, as a piece of crashed and salvaged equipment, is it is there a difference in terms of it s potential value to the syrian forces or someone else that might recover something like this? thankfully no there is no difference. all of the codes change. the frequencies that are used change. i can t envision isis or syria who have their hands full at the moment trying to reverse engineer drones, i don t think any of the information on the drone will be usable to them. and we change things all of the time to make sure it s not. drones fly definitely than piloted aircraft do, should we take comfort in that that if this was shot down that it doesn t tell us whether or not our pilots are at more risk? i think so. i think it is a good way to look at it, drones are slow, they re much less expensive. they have good lauder time.
he went on to congress. that story was not a big problem for him. but it might have been a first sign. this then became a big problem. february of this year a washington post style reporter names ben terrace stopped by his new office on capital hill and described the room this way, bright red walls, a gold wall sconce. the receptionist said the decor was based on downton abbey. and then his interior designer popped out of a doorway and introduced herself and showed the congressman s private office with a dramatic red motif with very memorable furnishings, like a chandelier and pheasant
any of the information on the drone will be usable to them. and we change things all of the time to make sure it s not. drones fly definitely than piloted aircraft do, should we take comfort in that that if this was shot down that it doesn t tell us whether or not our pilots are at more risk? i think so. i think it is a good way to look at it, drones are slow, they re much less expensive. they have good lauder time. they can hang around for a long, long time. manned aircraft are expensive and extremely lethal. they can detect when enemy radar locked on, enemy bullets or missils are on the way if and they shoot from over the horizon, way out of harm s way. so when we fly manned missions
the american chemistry council for their part is also having trouble explaining what happened here. a vice president for the group told the chronicle that it did you want mean the original document was generated here, anyone could have put that digital signature in there. if asking if she was denying that the american chemistry council wrote the document, she said i have no idea. there s no way for anyone to tell. they say we can confidently say that the document was created by a user with the american chemistry council. their name is designated by author. oops we left the lobbyist signature on the bill. it is the kind of laugh out loud moment that doesn t happen all that often in washington. when it does, it is a nice test to find out if washington is still capable of being
they can hang around for a long, long time. manned aircraft are expensive and extremely lethal. they can detect when enemy radar locked on, enemy bullets or missils are on the way if and they shoot from over the horizon, way out of harm s way. so when we fly manned missions in this area, we do so at a great distant from the target area, putting our guys far less at risk which is one reason why we use drones and not manned aircraft. jack jacobs, incredibly clarifying and helpful. thank you. straight ahead we have a lot to come including the interview tonight. senator barbara boxer is here.