by less than half a percentage point. it was a ss t landslide. it was a l mandate. w itas was also 40 years ago. and in some ways seems even longer than that. since reagan the positivistre puregu tonight, we will examine today . republican party on the eve of yet anotheblicr presidential election. what does the party believe, what is the republican position on foreign policy, cultural issues. how if the party has changed, where is it going? california and new york, will be popular vote be in play againag for a nominee or does winninaig require running the electoral college gauntlets. we are joined tonight by four people who have worked in or around politics for decades. they are very likely to have different views on some issues and may prioritize issuesiz differently. they maye sues represent peopley differensentt orthodoxies withie party but they have come together to discuss policy and politics in the upcoming race for president. as we begin tonight we start with a quoten
exactly breaking news. it s standard operating procedure. and yes.t tulsi gabbard won tha primary and then the seatse the democratic national part y took a deep interest in her. and you can see why he was a smart, appealing thirty one year old who knew what she believed and could shplain fluently. and by the way, she was also an iraq war veteran. tulsn political terms, tulsi gabbard was near perfect and they got it immediately. barack obama endorsed her right away. nancy pelosi called herled he personally and invited tulsi gabbard. did you remember this to speak on the opening night ofc the democratic national convention and then when she was sworn into congress in january , the dnc named tulsitha abbott, vice chair otif the national party. she just got in there thd she was vice chair of the dnc. and then, of course, the mediaay played its prescribed role. if nancy pelosi likes you also, do they so fawning profile, fawning profile emerged if you the timprofeelgton at ,you
by less than half a percentage point. it was a ss t landslide. it was a l mandate. w itas was also 40 years ago. and in some ways seems even longer than that. since reagan the positivistre puregu tonight, we will examine today . republican party on the eve of yet anotheblicr presidential election. what does the party believe, what is the republican position on foreign policy, cultural issues. how if the party has changed, where is it going? california and new york, will be popular vote be in play againag for a nominee or does winninaig require running the electoral college gauntlets. we are joined tonight by four people who have worked in or around politics for decades. they are very likely to have different views on some issues and may prioritize issuesiz differently. they maye sues represent peopley
data said. and we found out that the data was being absolutely misrepresented. beg they claimed that native bon americans could be compared apples to applesompared ap to il immigrants, except for texas doesn t collect data on native born americans. that s some other category nati s i unidentified illegal immigrants. and every year, especially ins e serious crime categories, texas keeps finding more illegals inin its prisons that weren t identified initially upon more arrest. so there s more andille more illegals amongalsg the convicted felons in texas. when texas goe texs back andas s on people s immigration status. so the cato study was a lie. and yet, as you said, it was weaponized immediately by the usual liars to shout downhave anyone who said, well, maybe we shouldn t have open borders. absolutely. w itas was a a mischaracterization because you used t misit useo bt to your own opinions, buled t nn your own facts. but now you re entitled toopin your own facts.ionsown fact ow but no