the alvin bragg case that s a really bad precedent because to your point, what what if this happened exactly in a in a texas courtroom with a texas a really read district attorney. this this opens a pandora s box in the future, which i m afraid that you re going to find some crazy person is going to pursue alvin bragg campaigned on you. no one s going to be able to have sex with a porn star and then pay somebody cover it up. now about this case is about this case is about how you file something to your checkbook. this is not about all those other things that may be the flashy, sexy stuff. but that this is about documents. this is a really boring case and it s hard and the american people i think kind of shrugged their shoulders by next week, this will be cut off the front pages until it won t begin in july 11th, three days before the republican convention. your previous guests, the judge is delusional. i think that he thinks that donald trump s going to serve prison time that you mig
permitted to go on the campaign trail. i guarantee you that donald trump would say, i d prefer not to have home the detention. it is a restriction on your liberty. there is no doubt about that. certainly trump s critics would not like to see him serve any of his time at any of his luxury properties including here at trump tower, whatever the sentence. judge vr sean has a number of options. erin. all right. jayson. thank you very much. and before we go, some news, just breaking tonight, the obamas are announcing that michel s mother, marion robinson, passed away today in chicago in a statement, former president obama writing with a healthy nudge, she agreed to move to the white house. we needed her the girls needed her, and she ended up being our rock through at all. according to michelle obama, she was most popular person in the white house something she and her mother have spoken about mad cow them into allowing me to do my own laundry and she was the most beloved figure in the wh
they re working on now. i think i m looking has he learned anything as he gives he contrite what we just saw? but what we saw it together there. so kinda like x that. and to me most serious is this is not the typical falsification of business records. kay said with all you d think of them as like the average person might think was like a green eye shade kind of thing like an accountant putting a book in the wrong drawer or something like that this is the connection crime here. the object crime was a violation of new york election law. 34, 34 separate felony counts where the jury found unanimously, that new york state election law was violated who likes to rant and rave constantly about election interference. election interference. well, the guy who was just convicted of 34 counts, essentially, if of election interference in an election in 2016, that was actually close enough that the actions he stands convicted of could have turned out electron, that s about a serious as it gets. and
wasn t surprised at all. some trump supporters were galvanized and upset over what they viewed as a rigged trial from the start, it just maybe angry because why is this even? you know, anything to do with what s going on now in a world like we have like so much going on in our worry about this, like cooling i feel like justice was just thrown out the window, restores my faith a little bit in the justice system, but other voters we spoke with in nearby warrington pencil we re pleased with the outcome. i know that there are some people who won t change their mind no matter what they will believe, the things he says, like the judge is corrupt and every everybody corrupt except him. of course. and i worry about that but i m i m hopeful i fell that the the jury did their job they actually student to me, they turn out to be a
nonviolent, 77-year-old person with no record whatsoever in a crime, anderson, where they re not talking about stealing millions of dollars dollar or any kind of massive corruption that s taken little old ladies dealing that they were not prove it wasn t proven that he stole the election. it was defined it unanimously. if you read the jury charge, the find unanimously beyond a reasonable doubt that there was that they stole that there was election interference, but we re able to attend okay. there was an intent with an intense two i want to know how many people in the united states of america who voted for donald trump would not have voted for him had they found out that when he was extorted by stormy daniels, he entered into a non-disclosure agreement and paid her up. and the judge already said, during we will never know that, but they were certainly earned enough to have gone ahead. yes. and commit robbery. did judge the judge said, i don t want to put you in jail, mr. trump,