republican party to lead someone in and give them access to private voting data in the machines of the voting system. first of all, the election law in georgia is very clear that only the secretary of state is the only person who can authorize access to computers. so, anyone in any local county does not have the authority to authorize access, so in the absence of authority, what we are looking at here are potential crimes of criminal in terms of altering or relieving data, either permanently or temporarily. but then also, computer invasion of privacy, where you are using a network without authorization to access personal information. i think a strong case could be made that voting records, or how people vote, fall within that personal information umbrella. there they are just checking
trespass in terms of altering or relieving data, either permanently or temporarily. but then also, computer invasion of privacy, where you are using a network without authorization to access personal information. i think a strong case could be made that voting records, or how people vote, would fall within that personal information umbrella. there they are just checking in their equipment, it is wild. we have been following this. there has been reporting for the washington post, someone from a civil lawsuit, about this forensic firm retained by sidney powell and other trump lawyers that can t access in several places around the country to this vote and data. in this case, it appears with the help and cooperation of this official, this local county chair. the county is a very republican county that went to trump in huge amounts. my other question for you is the jurisdiction question. we have an ongoing investigation into the fake
the polling is so sporadic it is hard to determine specifically who is going to come out on top. jerry nadler seems to be the man that and the name that his opponents are going after. really seeing some of the gloves come off during this particular race because when he think about what has happened here, we have someone like maloney and nadler who served alongside each other for some 30 years in d.c., now that the district has been withdrawn the friends have now basically now have to go after each other. they have similar voting records so how does one distinguish one self from the other person? you ve seen carolyn maloney and remember nadler and maloney both in their 70s. you have seen maloney basically accusing nadler of not having the mental capacity for the job. then you think about the third person in this equation who is suraj patel, the young progressive upstart, 238 years old and saying neither one of these are the right person for the job, you need new blood in
tell us no, as they should. there maybe some overlap, it s impossible to know, but at this point, we re not operating under that assumption. since i m here in wyoming, i want to ask about liz cheney. it s fair to say you and liz cheney have extremely different voting records and yet you have worked together on this committee for months now. we know the price she seems to be paying here where i am in wyoming. but can you give us some insights into the sort of big picture pressure you have seen her have to deal with in washington, nationally, and what your thoughts are now about someone who is your colleague, but also your political opposite. i didn t know liz very well before we served together on this committee. you re right, on the policy issues, there s very little overlap. she s very, very conservative voting record, and i don t have
where the leaks are coming from, and to try to pinpoint it. there is this barrage of articles, all people leaking democrats saying, we don t want him. one washington post headline, he is running, probably planted by the dnc or the white house or someone. they have him trying to court democrats at a time when they are sour on him. cassie: it s almost become a part of the talking points to say, i won t campaign with biden, i am a candidate, and there s a badge of honor that i m separate from him, which doesn t speak good of how popular or unpopular he is for their party. but i would just note that everybody take a look at the democrats voting records. if they vote with him, 95-100% of the time. to save your own hind in your own election, yet you keep voting with him. but i do think it is important that democrats are like, we d be fine with somebody else. but who is the somebody else?