that the state of texas, republican legislature and district lines they drew were discriminatory. you put minorities, pack them in some districts and maximize the opportunity for the white majority in the state. bare majority in the state. but you deny the rights of a whole lot of people. the same thing is happening, of course, with the issue of photo i.d. it s another oh, i know. to sort of restrict the votes in texas. all of that is under litigation? texas. what about the guy down there, attorney general running for governor, assuming there s been some kind of corruption down there, vote stealing, therefore he has to have these new laws. i do find it there are some places in the country, different places. nobody ever seems to be able to find it. if there was bulk volume stealing, they would get it. in pennsylvania as well, they never show up with any evidence of criminality to expand the law. right now as we speak in pennsylvania, we have no evidence of voter fraught by
of criminality to expand the law. right now as we speak in pennsylvania, we have no ef tense of voter broad by tfraugh other side. they tell people you need an i.d. to prevent voider fraud. what we know is it s about making it harder to vote for african-americans, and latino voters. in texas, they re the poster child for voter suppression. department of justice has decided they were going to do what they had to do to enforce the law. this is nothing new. it s a provision of the voting rights act. we re glad the attorney general is doing his job. let me ask you a question, wayne, about your state down there. is that state getting more diverse and perhaps more purple than red? of course, it is. you can tell by the growth many hispanic population, hispanics, of course, disproportionately vote democratic. it is more hispanic. more minority. it s moving toward democrats, but still a solidly republican state and it s run at this point by elected officials who are all republicans in the