say, what do we have here as fact and what dove as conjecture? and are we at a dead end or at the end of the line? do we pack up here and move or not? because i ll tell you as far as this panel that you ve had on for weeks, don, we are like doctors trying to to diagnose a patient over the phone and getting different pieces of information and they are conflicting. sit down and figure out where to go from here and we don t know until they have the meeting to sit down and have the get-together. all parties have to be they would call you to i m moving on to talk about this donald sterling investigation. they would use someone like you to authenticate whether or not it s him and how would that process go? what are they doing? there are two facphases. one is voice identification to see whether his voice, his continuity, his cadence, his
switched off, and then you hear a voice say, all right. good night, are you convinced that it is the pilot, given that we just talked to one pilot before the break who was saying usually there is a whole lot of other information identifiable information for the pilot before they say good night? is this how strange is this to you? it s strange. but richard s right. ordinarily you have to do the readback and you have to do the readback because, and it s part of air traffic control, because sometimes pilots get lost in the hertz. meaning they have the wrong frequency and switch over, there s not, no way to contact them. but air traffic controllers and pilots alike get sloppy, particularly at night. i ve had air traffic controllers wish me a happy birthday before and people don t usually get wound up about it. the second thing is, the fbi and law enforcement agencies around the world have a very reliable way to do voice identification. if they haven t done it already, they should alr
there are more inconsistency and more inaccuracies in this affidavit than meets the eye. one of them you pointed out, that they re saying that trayvon martin s mother is the one who made the voice identification. it wasn t trayvon s mother at that time or it was tracy martin who made a voice identification and there s dispute about how he didn t tell the police officers that it was his son. the police officers said it was his son. i was in that trial and when i look at this affidavit about another thing, saying that trayvon martin ran, that s not true. none of that came in the evidence. think about this. this affidavit is to support a second degree murder and bottom line is there s nothing showing ill will, spite or any of the prerequisite that is are necessary, greta. this is just atrocious and
exhibits. he was able to sit through that, but nothing having to do with voice identification whatsoever. the second day he was in the this morning for mr. duikers break. that was during that proffer when mr. west noticed he was in the so he was able to hear of first half during which he didn t say anything about anything. but even if he was here for that, you know the testimony to be that she heard somebody scream. so he was out of the courtroom at that point. he of course is present and waiting all day to testify, but also to be clear to what he changed. i contested the state s contention well, he added to it, but the case law we talk about and i ll talked to you about in a moment really speaks
bill: if i m the judge, i m going why so you believe it s all about voice identification? well, that s how they are going to get away with calling it but the judge should shut it down. other thing they have witnesses testifying that he got an a in criminal justice that he wanted to be a cop and rejected from being a cop because he had bad credit. that has nothing to do with whether or not the law of self-defense is available to whom and the prosecution has the burden now here i disagree with you. if i m the judge and i allow that because it goes to credibility. of the accused because that s what it is all about. it s about he said, she said, what kind of credibility. i would allow it. wait, let me tell you something. so what if you wanted to robo cop. trying to convict. it just goes to credibility. that s all. but you i would allow travon martin s background to be brought in as well. that s wrong. exactly. when the mother of trayvon martin can come up and testify that