Coverage today blake burman on how responding to the today meeting and ashley when it comes to irans oil the u. S. May already be winning. We begin with blake. Hi there, maria. As you know the Trump Administration is trying to carve out a deal as it relates to denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula with north korea. As that is happening, iran is warning north korea that the United States, in their words, cannot be trusted. The iranian leader Hasan Rouhani meeting earlier this week with a top diplomat from north korea and this was how that meeting was relayed as it comes from Iranian State media. One quote quoting Hasan Rouhani, quote the u. S. Administration performance in these years has led the country to be considered untrust one way or the other Anuntrustworthy Andunreliable ad which does not meet any of its obligations it comes as the Trump Administration has level idea new Sanctions Against Iran and says more sanctions will be coming in 90 days from now on
going to put in place
civil servants in the treasury but civil servants in the treasury operating under assumptions and rules, parameters set by political advisers working for the conservative party and a lot of people, including the civil servants, say those assumptions actually were designed to produce as big a figure as possible. i think some would say some parts of those figures are accurate but the overall number is too high. from a labour point of view, keir starmer eventually said late into the debate, i think the phrase he used was absolute garbage, but they will be frustrated he did not deny more vociferously. fiur be frustrated he did not deny more vociferously vociferously. our colleagues have one vociferously. our colleagues have gone through vociferously. our colleagues have gone through the vociferously. our colleagues have gone through the figures. - vociferously. our colleagues have gone through the figures. it - vociferously. our colleagues have gone through the figures. it is - gone
president biden today broke his silence on donald trump s unanimous guilty verdict with a not subtle response to trump s attacks on the judicial system. resident biden s comments follow an apparently deliberate strategy to address trump s trial, while maintaining an edict that biden himself put in place a year ago, that the entity is that the white house controls were not to publicly discuss any of the criminal investigations into trump, keeping a clear line between the west wing and the department of justice. it is unclear what the strategy will be when biden is not at the white house and is instead on the campaign trail. joining me now is mitchell andrew, biting campaign national co-chair and former lieutenant governor of louisiana. governor andrew, thank you for being here. i am eager to know, from what you can tell us, what the strategy might be once president biden is not at the white house, and whether he is going to speak more vociferously, perhaps, about the phelan front runner
now, a statement hat and dna right? coming up to the hill to respond to their questions what would you say democrats should do here i think democrats shoul push back as hard as they can. and i was glad to see alvi bragg do that. now, he has to be careful as well he has a job to do he is doing that job he also can t make this look like it is overly political. and, so far i think he has bee doing a good job of that but, allies on capitol hill fo instance need to call out thos republican committee chairs wh are doing something completely unprecedented. trying to interfere in the legitimate legal process of county da in new york. we haven t seen that kind of thing before, especially a vociferously as they have done over the last couple days. so they need to be called ou by those democrati representatives in washington. you ve run for presiden before you will probably do it again, somewhat hope. if you look around desantis, h hasn t announced yet
person. fox has argued vociferously that he is too far removed from the decision making in this individual case. the question of whether the material would air about dominion, that is the core of this suit, and because he s so far removed from that, ought not be a party to this suit at all. the judge seemed not to be warmed to that argument. he didn t answer the question but left open the possibility that murdoch could have enough information and could be pertinent enough he would be called. he also left open the question of whether, if he is called, he and others will be required to be there in person, although suggested in last week s hearings, he has a preference for in-person testimony. i want to ask you, too, about miss grossberg and which parts of what she s alleging her now former employer coached her to do could damage fox legally. i want to read this from her complaint.