but the institute worked with military leaders on a government-sponsored project for almost a decade.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) participated in a project, sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) a regime-funded scientific research institution from 2012 to 2018.
The project was comprised of a team of five military and civil experts, who conducted research at WIV labs, military labs, and other civil labs leading to “the discovery of animal pathogens [biological agents that causes disease] in wild animals.”
The WIV is located in central China’s Wuhan City, the COVID-19 pandemic ground zero. As an advanced virology institution, the WIV has the only P4 lab the highest biosafety level lab in China
Evidence Reveals That Military Team Collaborated With Lab Where COVID-19 Pandemic Originated
The Chinese regime has said its controversial virology institute had no relationship with the military, but the institute worked with military leaders on a government-sponsored project for almost a decade.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) participated in a project, sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) a regime-funded scientific research institution from 2012 to 2018. The project was comprised of a team of five military and civil experts, who conducted research at WIV labs, military labs, and other civil labs leading to “the discovery of animal pathogens [biological agents that causes disease] in wild animals.”
Recent comments by former CDC Director Robert Redfield, MD, on
CNN have helped push the question of the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, back to the forefront of public discussion. Two theories have emerged: one, favored by most virologists, is that SARS-CoV-2 was transmitted in the wild from an animal – a bat or intermediate host species – to a person before exploding in Wuhan. The other, pushed by a vocal minority, holds that the virus was being secretly researched at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a major research center, before escaping the lab through the accidental infection of a lab worker. Right now, we still don t know enough to be certain which route the virus took from its natural host to humans, though there are compelling reasons to believe the first scenario is far more probable. Redfield is suggesting more than an accidental version of the latter scenario though – he s saying that human action made SARS-CoV-2 the virus that it is.