investigation uncovers viral disinformation. what did they know and when did they know it next. nd when did they know it next. et s wrap thi, it s walgreens season. as someone who resembles someone else, i appreciate that liberty mutual knows everyone s unique. that s why they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. [ ferry horn honks ] i mean just cause you look like someone else doesn t mean you eat off the floor, [ chuckles ] or yell at the vacuum, or need flea medication. oh, yeah. that s the spot. only pay for what you need. liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty there s a different way to treat hiv. it s once-monthly injectable cabenuva. cabenuva is the only once-a-month, complete hiv treatment for adults who are undetectable.
The Atlantic
Despite considerable hype about foreign interference, the greatest danger to American democracy is domestic.
January 10, 2021
Shannon Stapleton / Reuters
The attack Wednesday on the U.S. Capitol was a product of the modern internet. The far-right extremists who forced their way into the building had consumed viral conspiracy theories about “stolen” elections and a “deep state” cabal theories that President Donald Trump himself amplified. The attackers had been radicalized. They saw themselves as heroes and truth-tellers.
Wednesday was not the first time the United States has been forced to reckon with social media’s impact on its politics. Four years earlier, to the day, American intelligence officials released a report describing Russian efforts to promote Trump’s candidacy and sow doubts about the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 presidential election campaign. As the 2020 election approached, the specter of a renewed foreign effort