changes in urination, and runny nose. do the walk of life yeah, you do the walk of life need to lower your blood sugar? ask your doctor about farxiga and visit our website to learn how you may be able to get every month free. welcome back to hannity. now since rising to power in cuba in 1959 after a violent revolution, communist dictator fidel castro and his cohorts have been responsible for some of the most egregious human rights violations in the western hemisphere including the mass execution, the indefinite imprisonment of countless political adversaries, support for latin american based terror
there has to be a revolution. he actually lean towards a violent revolution. it has to be non-violated and young people have to be involved and i think that we are there. i think that we are in the middle of it and i think that what just happened we have so many people. just think of this recent vote but didn t happen on syria. republicans and democrats, grassroots, say no more war. at the same time, leadership in the house and the senate republicans and democrats were all for it. so the grassroots got together, you know, i don t like this idea were rebuffed compromise, you know, raise taxes and do this and that. but we have a coalition of people who call themselves libertarian conservatives who
what motivated you to be frankly as gracious as you were? were you thinking about the poisono ouous atmosphere and wod about the future of the country? what went into the difficult decision to write that speech? well, the short answer is that our nation is built on the bedrock of rule of law, and upon investigation, that there is no intermediary step between a final supreme court decision and violent revolution. so, what i did was maybe best summarized by winston churchill in the famous description of americans. they generally do the right thing after first exhausting every available alternative. how difficult was it afterwards, just coming to terms with that? well, i ve always been an optimist by nature.
business being in enbenghazi with two cia agents or 100 cia agents. the country was unsecure, the country was in the middle of a violent revolution. he had been in the area a long time. new exactly what a really bad situation looked like, could recognize it, and really had no business being there. so there was some complicity at the state department about that. there was no reason for him to be there. you couldn t generate the kinds of forces that you woot require to defend the place in short order given a rotten situation that was taking place. there s a lot of blame going around. you could argue that the cia should have known this was a really rotten situation and could have sent a lot more agents there. if i are were the director of the cia i would argue i have no business sending more agents down there at a time when what you needed was for the
finished with a violent revolution, where a consulate that s relatively isolated should not be should not be defended at all. no, that s there s going to be an investigation. there s going to be a lot of finger pointing. but the state department has a lot to answer for in that regard. well, indeed, there s also a response that has to come. tell me what the appropriate response is from the united states when they have killed the highest official, the person who represents our country, in that country? well, without some intelligence, the united states has no idea who it is. i am told that the libyan government, such as it is, has promised the white house that it will assist in gathering the intelligence necessary to identify these people. but whether they will, or they won t, whether they can or they can t is something else again. remember that the government of libya has a domestic support among other people, radical