late august, trump s lawyers came to judge cannon ex insisting that a mixture of existing privilege, climate attorney privilege, and a violation of trump s constitutional rights should stop the normal course of business. stop the department of justice reviewing evidence gathered in the search of mar-a-lago. to the shock of just about everyone, cannon granted the trump lawyers request, appointing a special master to sift through the documents, something the doj already done. also effectively halted the investigation. it was roundly criticized by many legal committee, and finally it later this month there was just overturned, my panel of two trump appointees and george w. bush appointee on the 11th circuit court of appeals. the panel ruling in no uncertain terms. quote this appeal requires us to consider whether the district court had jurisdiction to block the united states from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation.
the answer is no. ouch! it was so clear that the ex presidents arguments wouldn t fly anywhere outside of cannons courtroom, his lawyers didn t even bother appealing to the supreme court. so to recap, trump making a ridiculous argument landed in front of a friendly judge he appointed to do precisely what he wanted, even a clear violation of presidential law. so you ask yourself, how exactly did she get in the bench? we went back and check the tape. it turns out there was not a ton of very heavy vetting. judge aileen cannon is a member of the federal society, which vets conservative judges. she was confirmed in the lane duck session, five days after was clear that trump had lost the election while we still at planning s attempted coup. the confirmation came judge cannon spoke for a grand total of 210 seconds, mostly yes, no, peaceful assembly is good answers. she answered about 90 written
and then what is amazing is that it continued in the days after january 6th. and you see it on january 8th, january 9th, people like mo brooks, you see louis gohmert calling for an investigation, he wanted constitutionally loyal doj personnel to act before trump this is 3:45. we are still not out of the woods at that point. the capital, i think, still has not been cleared at that point. jason miller this is a high-level trump advisor comey crazy, but ideas for two tweets from potus. number one, bad apples, likely antifa, craze leftist s, infiltrated today s peaceful protests over fraudulent vote count. violence is never acceptable. maga supporters embrace our police. should leave the capitol. now are now trying to blame peaceful and innocent maga supporters for violent actions. this is not who we are. our people should hit home and let the criminals suffer the consequences. so, he is floating this when they have not even clear the
what s the next chapter? that s the real question. with fidelity income planning, a dedicated advisor can help you grow and protect your wealth, even when you re not working. they ll look at your full financial picture and help you create a flexible strategy designed to balance growth potential and guaranteed income. so you can stop worrying about the future and enjoy the life you ve created. that s the planning effect. from fidelity. on monday, a federal district judge from florida aileen cannon issued the typical part since writing on the blackboard off the miss behaved. vacating it says a big bold letters dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. you won t recall that back in
you won t recall that back in late august, trump s lawyers came to judge cannon insisting that a mixture of existing privilege, client attorney privilege, and a violation of trump s constitutional rights should stop the normal course of business. stop the department of justice reviewing evidence gathered in the search of mar-a-lago. to the shock of just about everyone, cannon granted the trump lawyer s request, appointing a special master to sift through the documents, something the doj had already done. it also effectively halted the investigation. it was roundly criticized by many legal committees, and finally earlier this month it was just overturned, by a panel of two trump appointees and a george w. bush appointee on the 11th circuit court of appeals. the panel ruling in no uncertain terms. quote this appeal requires us to consider whether the district court had jurisdiction to block the united states from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation. the answer is no