their borders and block the judicial review necessary to vindicate federal rights. chief justice john roberts who voted in september to block the law from going into effect seemed exasperated by the solicitor general for the state of texas, judd stone. assume that the bounty is not $10,000 but $1 million. do you think in that case the chill on the conduct at issue here would be sufficient to allow federal court review prior to the end of the state court process? no, your honor. i might add this is specifically a damages action. it is capped at much less than that. that is a significant difference. my question is what we call a hypothetical. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting solicitor general and msnbc contributor. neal, i want to begin with that last point that the chief made about his hypothetical and what
constitutional structure. states are free to ask this court to reconsider its constitutional precedence, but they are not free to place themselves above this court, nullify the court s decisions in their borders, and block the judicial review necessary to vindicate federal rights. chief justice who voted in september to block the law from going into effect seemed exasperated by the solicitor general by for the state of texas, we assume that the bounty is not $10,000 but 1 million dollars. do you think in that case the chill on the conduct at issue here would be sufficient to allow federal court review prior to the end of the state core process? no, your honor. i might add this is a specifically a damage accident, it is kept at much my question is a