before the 2016 election. i was in cleveland for the rnc convention. some of the t-shirts and buttons were vile. i saw older women wearing them about trump grabbing by the there were women putting that on their bodies saying he can do that. there were violent, threatening messages about hillary clinton, just violent. what i don t understand i guess is these people control the supreme court, the white house, both houses of congress, a majority of state houses, and yet they are enraged. what are they angry about? is it because people are resisting their rule? i think they re realizing for the very first time and i think it started i think back to the women s march where you had three times the amount of time turn out for that than who watched donald trump get inaugurated in a completely 100% peaceful demonstration by the way of protests. this harnessing of power, you have more women running for public office than ever before,
directed at you from people that you know want to do you harm, people that you know advocate for violence, this isn t a peaceful protest. there s a very, very big difference in peaceful assembly and exercising your right to protest this government and doing what we re seeing right there. we ve seen that this group, whether it s in los angeles, new york have had instances where they insight violence wherever they go. that s a very scary thing and a very different thing. that s what a mob is. there s a little false equivalency and the media will do it. people who say shame, shame, shame, why are you caging children, this is a pretty intimidating thing, a man, hurling vile epithets at an older woman. right. i would echo kurt s point and also i think this isn t new, this isn t something that we re just now seeing. donald trump often stokes the anger and ire in his audience at rallies or he has people call the press the enemy of the