citigroup, jpmorgan, bank of america. wall street spends a lot of time and money on congress. and now harry reid is promising a debate on this in the senate, a republican vote just sent this vil loefr to the senate. howard dean, i cannot wait to see this debate. because the most thankful possible role on the senate floor is going to be a democrat standing up there trying to argue with elizabeth warren on this subject. i can t imagine what that looks like. it s going to be very, very tough. the belief that this could lead to further bailouts is right as well. they re making it easier to use wall street as a gambling casino. that s very bad for the country and bad for wall street, i think, in the long run. i come from four generations of wall street, and my mother keeps
we put this rule in place because people of all political persuasions were disgusted at the idea of future bailouts. why in the world would anyone want to repeal it? let alone hold the entire government hostage in order to ram through this appeal. the reason unfortunately is simple it s about money, and it s about power. because while this legal change could pose serious risks to our entire economy, it will also make a lot of money for wall street banks. according to americans for financial reform, this change will be a huge boon for a handful of our biggest banks. citigroup, jpmorgan, bank of america. wall street spends a lot of time and money on congress. and now harry reid is promising a debate on this in the senate, a republican vote just sent this vil loefr to the senate. howard dean, i cannot wait to