brought up today at the white house press briefing about what countries would be a target. this is the response from robert gibbs. if a country if we see that a country greatly expands its biological or chemical weapons capability, the posture of view calls for the ability to re-evaluate any assurances that have been given. our country possesses a massive conventional arsenal that we believe has an important deterrent effect on anybody that might make the poor decision to attack our country. cliff, are we going to be safe with this policy? safer than we are tonight? no safer than we are tonight. at best you can say it s neutral. they re saying, don t worry we won t retaliate unless we think we should. we re saying, what else, we re