i think you so. and my view is this. i think all of that pregame stuff is going to burn off. once we re actually talking about these issues. there is is a loft hype and so forth. i think when it all comes down to it, the focal point is going to be what did she know? what were the facts on the ground? did she get the benefit of certain things or was she denied certain things. i still think the video discussion is weird. and the president carried it out really long. he went on television with it. i think he went on the view with it for a couple weeks. u.n. general assembly. the whole thing provoked by video. are a and for the life of me i first him heard they came down and brought mortars and rpgs when i was in wisconsin that wasn t a spontaneous protest by any means. i don t know why they drug that out so long. i can understand being a mistake in the beginning but why did it get dragged out. even when they were beginning these discussions these were contemporaneous with americans
it make? is that the same level? i think you so. and my view is this. i think all of that pregame stuff is going to burn off. once we re actually talking about these issues. there is is a loft hype and so forth. i think when it all comes down to it, the focal point is going to be what did she know? what were the facts on the ground? did she get the benefit of certain things or was she denied certain things. i still think the video discussion is weird. and the president carried it out really long. he went on television with it. i think he went on the view with it for a couple weeks. u.n. general assembly. the whole thing provoked by video. are a and for the life of me i first him heard they came down and brought mortars and rpgs when i was in wisconsin that wasn t a spontaneous protest by any means. i don t know why they drug that out so long. i can understand being a mistake in the beginning but why did it get dragged out. even when they were beginning these discussions these wer