Vacos Cam
Battery-powered security cameras are a great option for outdoor use, because they remove the logistical hassle of finding a convenient electrical outlet to power them. But their easier installation comes with a cost, as they tend to be priced higher than their AC-powered counterparts. The $139 Vacos Cam would seem to be the best of both worlds, then supremely flexible, modestly priced. Unfortunately, testing revealed this camera to be far from a polished product. While its video quality and smart motion detection are solid, its barely baked app makes the camera virtually unusable.
The camera is the latest to crib its look from the Arlo line of home security cameras, in this case the Arlo Go (except that camera connects to the internet via an onboard LTE radio). It’s powered by an integrated lithium-ion battery that promises up to six months of usage per full charge. It has an IP66 weatherproof rating indicating it’s impervious to dust and resistant to jets of
there s already been action taken. there s already been safety measures taken. not only the airlines have taken measures to say we do need two people in that cockpit now as a mitigation but the regulatory authority themselves they totally skipped right over this part of figuring out what happened and then applying the regulation which is incredibly time consuming. flight 447, we re still waiting on things to respond to that accident. but this is different. this is very different. i think there s a shift in the culture. i think partly it s because of all the exposure the airlines and the industry have got. the pilot union has stood in opposition to realtime transmission of data. how in the face of this and all the questions that remain can can they remain against it? what they have been against, which i don t think is the case now, is the transmission of realtime video data. the transmission of actual day antarctica it happens all the time from the aircraft. audio and video is what
issues for the public and for the police officers. one big challenge is stimply storing and managing vast amounts of video data. how long are they kept? a traffic accident a few weeks but a homicide investigation, perhaps decades. reporter: already cameras have been used to exonerate and discipline officers. we trust them. we give them a gun and a badge but this is a way to review what s hatching if there s a complaint. and cameras say advocates have a funny way of assuring police and citizens are on their best behavior. we ll see how that plays out. i m sure we ll be reviewing all of the body cameras. on monday president obama revealed the white house s task force on law enforcement practices across the country. among the requirements, independent investigations when deadly force or injury is caused by police. the task force rejected a.
different places. these cameras do not have to be available to the public. it seems you are scapegoating the issue here? no. actually the issue has been studied before. the faa has commissioned federal advisory commission to look at the data provisions and the data handling. the last time they looked ate, they said there is currently not the safeguards in the system to handle video data appropriately and safely. the other thing that a airplane, a modern jet has in excess of 1,000 data points from the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder already recorded. you don t see from buses and ships and other vehicle we have a state of the art program that ensures the safety system. the video issue behind privacy concerns. there is great expectation of privacy in the flight deck as well. let s talk about privacy. everyone from 7-eleven to here in the building in the time warner, cnn center in atlanta, department store in a taxi, there are cameras in every
might be getting e-mails. captain, there are other modes of transportation, there are trains, buses, a number of modes of transportation that have streaming video and cameras. you have cameras in a number of different places. these cameras do not have to be available to the public. it seems you are scapegoating the issue here? no. actually the issue has been studied before. the faa has commissioned federal advisory commission to look at the data provisions and the data handling. the last time they looked ate, they said there is currently not the safeguards in the system to handle video data appropriately and safely. the other thing that a airplane, a modern jet has in excess of 1,000 data points from the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder already recorded. you don t sthee from buses and ships and other vehicle we have a state of the art program that ensures the safety om system. the video issue behind privacy concerns.