needing 60 votes to break a filibuster, she kept it to just 52, a huge legislative shortfall for his trade bill. does this mean the victory of the protectionist argument? it s not clear. 14 democrats could still be persuaded to vote the pro-trade side, but today s vote was a clear cut it defeat by the insurgent senator warren a smashing defeat for her fellow democrat in the white house who was unable knowing the pressure was on to rally partisans to his side. so what s this say for 2016? well warren s victory perk up the draft warren forces out there? will it drive hillary clinton who has yet to declare sides on trade issue, to join today s winning side? will it shao warren or her ally sherrod brown on to the 2016 hillary ticket? chris jansing is at the white house. chris, what is the president going to do after this resounding defeat. reporter: already moving and