Which was the Planning Department recommendation or the Planning Department version all make those as described and roman numeral the Planning Department with user as sponsor and table item 4. Thats correct. So why dont we do that now supervisor mar has described a series of amendments reduced to writing as well why dont we have a motion to make those amendments item number 3 . Okay well take that without objection. Well adapt those amendments item 3 and madam clerk if you could add supervisor mar as the author of item 3 and can i have a motion to table item number 4 okay well take that without objection. Item 4 is tabled now were working with the amended version of item number 3 so i just want to say a few things and make the amendments ill briefly describe at the beginning so this amended version obviously no one got exactly what they wanted with the compromise and a number of things not everything is exactly the way i would have done it but weve made a lot of process in particular i
Good morning, everyone, welcome to the board of supervisors, budget finance and committee meeting, for october, 29, i am joined by john amylee howcroft, and i want to thanks charles for sfgovt tv for covering this meeting and the clerk of the meeting, miss wo ng. Silence all cell phones and any Electronic Devices and completed speaker cards and copies of documents should be submitted to the clerk sxit ems acted upon will be on the november 4th, board of supervisors agenda, always otherwise state. Could you call item one . Item one is,resolution retroactively authorizing the Public Defenders Office to accept and expend a grant in the amount of 75,889 from the board of state and Community Corrections for the purposes of implementing local juvenile justice Accountability Measures through the juvenile accountability block grant, for the term of july 1, 2014, through june 30, 2015. Thank you, we have the Public Defenders Office to speak. Thank you for having us on the agenda and especially
President of the Real Estate Company we special in small and did not firms and born and raised in the sunset district now old enough when there was 5 Grocery Stores between 28 avenue things are changed i represent several buildings in the tar bell areas that be vacated for two or three years and represent tenants that are existed about potentially going there only told that the timeframe taxes five to six most it is the cost that takes to build a retail store some of the issues are the add costs relate to the regulatory issues ada compliance if you take a 4 e 32 square feet store it is 60 and 100,000 per square feet if i add that on to a 6 to 9 months period of time you have a landlord noted getting rent having you have a problem where no one wants to take the risk and the foot traffic on tar bell it is will like union street interests no traffic if you dont have traffic you dont have customers what drives this is the formula retail when starbucks went into an oil 21 it created excitem
Series of amendments reduced to writing as well why dont we have a motion to make those amendments item number 3 . Okay well take that without objection. Well adapt those amendments item 3 and madam clerk if you could add supervisor mar as the author of item 3 and can i have a motion to table item number 4 okay well take that without objection. Item 4 is tabled now were working with the amended version of item number 3 so i just want to say a few things and make the amendments ill briefly describe at the beginning so this amended version obviously no one got exactly what they wanted with the compromise and a number of things not everything is exactly the way i would have done it but weve made a lot of process in particular i was pleased to see the Environmental Review Environmental Review study i was concerned the original proposal in supervisor mar the Environmental Review Environmental Review study was manipulative broad and the formula retail establishments could get caught up in an
These effort and so unfortunately, you know, in situations like these, really, are too bad, because if we could have worked with this person, and maybe, there would be one count here in stead of six and possibly none, if they had paid off their debt and cleared out their bank, before that first filing deadline that they missed, you know, we take it retroactively terminate and that would have been the end of it but those obligations do exist and we are pretty clear in the training that the election day is not the end of the campaign. And for example, the public finance, candidates they have even more obligations and so we have to be sure that these folks know what they are, and but it is that syndrome that i just described that contributes a lot to this. Understandable. And the other thing that i would say and what is the number, and it is 9,000 that the staff is recommended and the 9,000 penalty, is that right. Yes. And if you will allow me to try to add a rationale to a number. And in