The headline is san antonio 320 at home this year. They now are alone at third, 41 consecutive wins, a couple days shy of a full calendar year since they last lost at home. Kawhi leonard, nine in the fourth, 26point game and hes standing by with lisa. Thank you, mike. Kawhi, you guys turned it on in the fourth quarter. What was the difference down the stretch in in game . We p finally started to knock down shots. 26 points in the game but nine in the fourth quarter. What changed for you . Like i said, i just started to knock down shots, got my rhythm going, my teammates found me, and just kept going from there. On the defensive end, how are you guys able to keep their we just competed the whole game and contest every shot. Thank you. Talk about the stars, lisa and what they did. Oklahoma citys best players only one of nine from three. As a Team Oklahoma city only 17 points, shooting six of 18 in the fourth quarter. Guys, thanks for letting me hang with you saturday night primetime. Mar
Political restraints, this is a good thing. This is removing the con strant on theest maters that my concern is exactly what youre talking about. That theyll actually be pushed that congress would be mad if they say we dont know. Im very sympathetic because were just saying this is good for growth or bad for growth. But the problem is the answer should be no if we dont no. Do we know enough about this . Yeah, we know enough about this as just as much as efg educational that we score. I think we know a lit less. Im not sure thats true. Honestly. We know that the precise answer of zero is exactly wrong. Theres no virtue to being exactly wrong. By knowing that there might be an impact and saying well ignore it. So i think sort of doing this makes sense. Remember, this bill would probably not get dynamically scored. Its not big enough, the one youre worried about. This is only done in the house rule and should only be done for a major piece of legislation at large predictable impacts. So m
Political balance, i dont see is fundamentally changed. I mean i think back to tarp. That was my next question. And some internal conversations about a, how much money do we need . B, how much money do you think we can get away asking for . You know, 500 billion. Well, maybe maybe not. But if youre asking for 500, you mine as well ask for 700, just dont ask for 1 trillion. The people who thought that tarp was terrible policy or were shocked wiby the price tag, i think would have been efvery shocked at 500 billion as they were with the bill that actually went up. Well, i think that im not sure that you would really get the help that you would need. I am a huge advocate if you know my work, im a huge advocate of temporary fiscal intervention in a spirit of the times that we faced in the heart of the great depression. I think the global results of austerity which is contraction of that is exhibit a what good fiscal policy looks like and what bad fiscal policy look like including implicati
Appropriations. And in fact just speaking a touch more broadly. I tried to think about the positives and the negatives of dynamic scoring on the spending side and all i could come one were negatives. The idea that there are biases against spending scores being positive throughout the process. The most important one just let me get it out on the table is and this is from work that richard koegen did. I didnt know about this. It is a bias that would lead any dynamic spending scores to simply provide more room for tax cuts not for more spending. So the budget act enforces allocations on the revenue side. On the Revenue Target and on the allocation target. And house and senate rules disallow taxes to go below the revenue floor or appropriations to go above committees allocations. Under the rule that were talking about the house dynamic scoring rule, if we were to move towards scoring Discretionary Spending any positive growth effects would be scored almost entirely as extra revenues just b
But his comments over the weekend have continued to dog him all day. John roberts has more. Good evening, john. Reporter bret, good evening to you. Donald trump in pennsylvania, hes been here a number of times. But its a state that hasnt voted for a republican since 1988, but it remains a big battleground state donald trump needs to put in his win column if he hopes to become president. Donald trump followed his rival into ohio and pennsylvania today, hoping to flip the outcome of the 2012 race. Its very sad. You know, shouldnt be so much about politics, folks. Were going to do a town hall, so well be talking about questions. Reporter clinton now leads in both states, though two polls in ohio had the race there even up. Trump is banking his political hopes on a message of economic opportunity, contrasting his plans for job creation, lower taxes, and better trade deals with those than his opponent. Ohio has lost 1 in 3 manufacturing jobs since bill clinton signed nafta. Bill clinton sig