around social media. online dating, it s something like a $1.5 billion enterprise. don t you think it makes sense that people would want to vet the people they are connecting with online? protect themselves from the criminals out there. greg: i m on two sides of this fence. number one, i ve read everythin everything. the day i was born, i would bett my parents. i miss the risk of a bar. going into a bar, you never know what s going to happen. you might meet an amazing person, a crazy amazing person. the fun thing about a bar, you get the feeling this could be a good night. you don t have that anymore online. you don t have the excitement. but i was so you don t need a vetting system to do this. you can do this on your own. judge jeanine: how do you do it? if you are communicating with someone online, there is cat fishing.
who wants to spend time with her parents and be able to spend time with her family, she sponsored them to become american citizens, correct? absolutely. look, let s put things in perspective here. at a best, the president s intention is to protect us from terrorists and isis and to have a better vetting system to make sure qualified people come to the united states. melania trump is not president of the united states. she s married to the president of the united states, and, yes, years ago she began the process as an american citizen following millions of others in trying to bring her parents to the united states. they got green cards and eventually when they were interested and eligible, they on their own then applied lawfully for citizenship and obtained the great privilege yesterday. mrs. trump effectively, and i spoke to her this afternoon, has given great comfort as she does the nation s work knowing that her parent, the grandparents of her child can actually work and look after
helps those countries to improve their vetting system. shannon: the california case, justice thomas offered the 5-4 opinion saying pro-life pregnancy centers in california being sourced to tell people where they can get abortions which is against the mission of what they re trying to do or have numerous disclosures in multiple languages and all kinds of things other clinics didn t have to do, sent the case back saying they have a chance of challenging and defeating the california law but that kind of ruling would never have happened without the nomination of justice course which and this president has nominated a lot of judges that are viewed as pro-life, conservative and fulfilling that promise. it has been over 500 days of what i would say american success when it comes to donald trump whether on economic security, national security and
ainsley: no. he didn t he said it was a vetting system. he never said it was a slim ban. steve: during the campaign he did talk about how he would essentially like to keep any muslims coming into the country. that was during the campaign. then again you look at the ruling, the chief justice said religion had nothing to do with this. however, justice kennedy in a lecture to all political leaders but really a message to donald trump said you need to respect the constitutional liberties as freedom of religion as well. ainsley: the president said it s about investigating and the vetting system in these countries is inadequate and we don t want dangerous individuals, tastes coming into our country. steve: syria. how many times do we do stories isis went through syria and knocked different towns and take all the passports. people who held syrian passports couldn t be sure they were who they zoned the
they think his motive was clear. the list include venezuela and north korea. it doesn t have to do with religion. picked, many came from those that congress and the obama administration said those countries posed serious national security threats. we saw the department of homeland security and the director of national intelligence they evaluated over 200 countries to say you need the accurate information to determine which citizens can come into and out of our country. that s a safety standard that we need not only does it help our country, but it helps those countries to better improve their vetting system. shannon: yes. the california case.