decide that there s a reason to go in that direction. but the vast majority of people will not be questioned in that way. we don t go into their luggage and inspect their luggage. it s the same kind of thing. we will do it when we think there s a reason to do it. all right. charlie, is this the secretary getting in front of the legal challenges that will probably arise from this type of extreme vetting or is this just the administration playing kind of both sides of this? they re being concerned with the vetting issue, and most americans believe that. while the bans make their way through the courts, this is another way to play it. i think that s exactly right. i think that it reveals obviously a change in direction from u.s. policy. you know, we can debate the effectiveness of some of these things, the effectiveness of searching people s social media, things like that, but the idea that people coming into our country have, you know, privacy rights, our rights don t apply to people
on what is fair and what is practical which is this is your country, the citizens from your country, we jailed them for a period of time, now they finish their sentence, they need to go home. or we found them after they ve been accused of multiple felonies. we re going to deal with them and then ultimately they will have to go home. apparently we are supposed be housing the world s criminal population as long as they came here legally first. it s craziness. sean: isn t non-american non-american to say come in legally and are you going to respect our sovereignty and law? similarly, it s the same thing with the whole issue. the vetting issue. seven countries that have ties to terror training, but we are not going to gamble with the lives of american people. what other country can you think of any that allows anybody, you can walk across the border, stay there, when i go to
practical which is this is your country, the citizens from yourt country, we jailed them for a i period of time, now they finish their sentence, they need to go home. or we found them after they ve been accused of multipler felonies. we re going to deal with them and then ultimately they will have to go home. bearently we are supposed housing the world s criminal population as long as they came here legally first. it s craziness. sean: isn t non-american non-american to say come in legally and are you going to respect our sovereignty and law? similarly, it s the same thing it s with the whole vetting issue. seven countries that have ties to terror training, but we are not going to gamble with the lives of american people. what other country, can you think of any, that allowse. anybody, you can walk across the border, stay there, when i go to great britain i have been to
foreign policy challenges if he is confirmed. as it is expected he will be. mike emanuel has the latest from capitol hill. in number of lawmakers are praising president trump for this executive action taking a closer look at the refugee vetting process peer senators john mccain and lindsey graham have expressed concern that this executive action will become a self inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism. their concern is that there was not enough consultation before taking action. others praised the president for making sure the government does everything possible to know who is entering this country. to the extent they are trying to improve the vetting process, i think that is in order. we need to bear in mind that we don t have religious tests in this country, and we also need to remember that some of our best allies in the war against islamic terrorism are muslim. i think it was not properly vetted so extreme vetting proposal that did not get the vetting issue had come
illegal immigration sanctuary cities and national security. this is the gravest threat facing the country because it s an issue of life or death. for the president of the united states and the attorney general and the rest of the executive branch, who is responsible for enforcing federal immigration law and enforcing the border to not do it especially in the light of the recent terror attacks. this is a supreme dereliction of duty. hun hun temperaturian authorities with five fake passports. did not take to watch the soccer game. they are coming here. it s very alarming. also going to the testimony loretta lynch said something else i thought was interesting yesterday. she said we have a robust vetting. that is different what james comey said we don t have the intelligence to vet them. nobody has any confidence that anybody can be vetted at this point in history. clarity around the vetting issue to me that s the single issue. it s possible they have a