the white house went was pressed on this issue earlier. are you worried if roe v. wade is overturned, the code the violence against there s been court justices. are these threats from pro-abortion activists or antiabortion activists? the president is clear on this question but he believed the right to peacefully protest in this country is fundamental. he also believes that violent threats and intimidation have no place in political discourse anywhere. it seems like to s, it is a very one sided on what we call out as intimidation or as violent. so we. so we want to make sure we are calling out on both sides of what is happening and what we are seeing. that is what she is saying. dhs has obsolete until an information or something telling them that they need to put up this memo to safe or the left is
intending to commit violence if this roe v. wade decision comes down the way we expect. now they will telegraph before we dropped the ball. whether it is afghanistan, dealing with hitting baby food, it is always the same thing. there s always a plan after the effect. this time they are trying to get in front of it. again, what would curtail this step would be adding providing more security for justices, which would mean, what? marks police officers. which dates fundamentally have gone against and completed and disrespected. so this is not going to have the same effect where you will see people on tv, oh, it is a mostly peaceful protest. americans are sick of this. they will see it standing outside of that supreme court justices house will only inspire more and more americans to vote right. and you have seen what happened before. you have seen and the best thing you re telling us is look out, it is coming. where is the plan? what are you doing? national guard?
are you literally going to delegitimized your own marriage? it is so thick with ridiculousness that i honestly am at a loss for words. yeah, i was going to say, the people have been ringing the alarm bells for the last couple of years saying that we should be taking this seriously in terms of what other doors and cans it opens. they are pointing to all these other things that could be opened by weakening the 14th amendment as a result of overturning roe versus wade. battles michaels, erin haines, liz winced ed, thank you for joining us this weekend, we appreciate your time and insight as always. thank you at home for making time for us, make sure to come back tomorrow night 9 pm eastern right here on msnbc, we will have the very latest developments on the buffalo shooting for now, i am ayman, goodnight from new york.
yeah, there was no mention of his colleagues experience which means that he didn t feel like she was miss treated. a lot of people who were watching the hearings felt otherwise. we don t know given the audience whether he was asked about his wife s role, but a lot of people, to your point, and to liz s point, have questions about whether or not that presents a conflict of interest for him. one of the interesting things that i took away from hearing his comments, he is the longest serving person in the court, he has seen a lot, he signals where he lands on roe v. wade, and it was interesting to hear from him because we rarely hear from him. he spoke at length during this interview, and he was pretty clear that he appeared to be aligned with justices lead owes draft opinion, so we don t know with the final opinion is going to be but it looks like his belief is that roe should be
also the thing that i find so profoundly bizarre in all of it is that as we talk about the slippery slope of how we interpret the 14th amendment and that it doesn t just go to abortion, it could go to interracial marriage, you re in an interracial marriage, sir, are you literally going to delegitimized your own marriage? it is so thick with ridiculousness that i honestly am at a loss for words. yeah, i was going to say, the people have been ringing the alarm bells for the last couple of years saying that we should be taking this seriously in terms of what other doors and cans it opens. they are pointing to all these other things that could be opened by weakening the 14th amendment as a result of overturning roe versus wade. battles michaels, erin haines,