world, we know news organizations take on enormous risk when they publish things they know to be false. they risk their representations. in the rare instances where actual malice can be established, they also face legal exposure. this knowledge of falsity on fox s part was established through mountains of internal communications that prove that the producers, the executives and the anchors knew that claims of massive voter fraud were false ahead of time and they broadcast them anyway. the case dominion had against fox was so strong that by the time the trial commenced, the only thing the jury was going to have to determine was whether fox met that really, really high legal bar of acting with actual malice when it knowingly published falsities about dominion. now, as we all know, instead of standing trial, fox decided to settle for close to $800 million. what we know from that discovery process is dominion established from the top of that company to the bottom, from ruper murd
witnesses. it needs to be independent, and that should lead to some form of accountability in the shooting death of an american citizen and prominent journalist. reporter: katy, the fbi has launched an investigation into shah reen s death. from what we can tell, that investigation doesn t appear to be making a lot of progress. they still have not spoken to a number of key witnesses in the west bank. raf sanchez, thank you very much. that is going to do it for me. deadline: white house starts right now. hi everyone. it s 4:00 in new york. a special two-hour program today focused on extremism and hate and the perils of platforming it. in a post dominion versus fox