Latest Breaking News On - Version congress - Page 1 : comparemela.com
Misusing children as political tools : Child rights body seeks action against Rahul Gandhi | बच्चों का राजनीतिक हथियार के रूप में इस्तेमाल गलत , NCPCR ने राहुल गांधी के खिलाफ की एक्शन की मांग
patrika.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from patrika.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
of those four do you believe the supremes address all of them, one of them or perhaps two or three? i think they, bill, i think they address all of them. but the big mystery is what are they going to say on each one of them. you know, that s the fascinating part. i actually think if i were to pick which one two do i like the most, it s the whole issue of severability, and let me explain what that is. it s that when congress passes a statute, it usually includes what s called a severability clause meaning if it s someplace down the road someone strikes something unconstitutional, for instance, here the mandate, the rest of the statute still lives. everything else in the health care statute would still live. without the severability clause what should happen if they strike any part of that statute at all, what should happen is the entire statute fails. in the final version congress took it out, and the supreme court should look to the
we re not suggesting it will fix all our fiscal problems, but what we think this will help do is help change the culture of spending here, that both parties have been a party to. what we want to do is basically give us this tool so that we can impair race the wasteful spending out of these spending bills. it s a constitutional version, so the president can pull a piece of pork out of the bill, send it back to congress, congress has to vote to it, no amendments, can t duck the vote, so we take the execution, the action, therefore it s constitutional, but this is a way of embarrassing pork out of the bills in the first place and getting after it if it s been put in there afterwards. again, both republicans and democrats have messed up this system. they have given us a lot of wasteful spending. we think this is a good tool that both of us agree on going after that wasteful spending. we want to show that we don t always go at each other s throats. we can great on some things. this is one
gets after the shenanigans played at the last minute when writing appropriation bills tucking a spending provision in there that nobody ever sees. this goes after those games, which both parties have been a party to. we banned earmarks, but that doesn t get at the heart of this issue, and we think this is a step in the right direction. what it does, andrea is makes it much harder for a member of congress to sort of quietly slip on a spending project that may not be in the national interests. right. and sneak it on by sticking it with everything else that is legitimate spending. it s kind of the christmas tree approach, where a lot of people may want to add their ornament. this says we re going to take an opportunity to have an up or down vote on the things that may not be necessary. now that i ve got you both there, more or less a captive audience, you ve agreed on the line-item proposal. how about the payroll tax?
can we work something out about that now? congress mast ryan? i think so. we re in discussions about that. we want to pay for it. this was meant to be a temporary tax rebate, i don t think the. you think it s a sugar high? yeah, i do. i do, but of course i likes the idea of people keeping more of their own money. if el got a chance at cutting wasteful spending, that to me is two steps in the right direction. we have to watch making this perm nent. if we do that we re accelerating the bankruptcy or social security or complicit with general funds transfer, which turn into a cash welfare program, so this is meant to be temporary policy, we should treat it that way, and i don t think it s very good economics, but at the end of the day i think it s great and fine that people deep more of their money. what if you paid for it, guys with how about taxing the rich?
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.