Latest Breaking News On - Verona house - Page 1 : comparemela.com

What underscores my concern about your willingness to overturn roe v. Wade which is really the expectation that the president has in which senator hawley fully expects you to do because youve met his litmus test. The precedent. Youve argued that its a justices duty to follow the constitution which explains, she should, regarding your view on precedent, that that she should enforce her best understanding of the constitution rather than a precedent she thinks clearly and in conflict with it. Use in constitutional cases are the easiest to overrule because you bring your own assessment of what the constitution requires. As you said, if the president is clearly in the precedent isnt conflict with your view of the competition then the precedent falls by the wayside. You did indicate there are a few cases that are immunized from overturning because they wouldnt be challenged in the first place, i. E. Brown v board of education. But roe isnt one of those cases because we know that theyre all a

United statesSan franciscoAmy coney barrettJuan williamsJoni ernstRoe v wadeNotre dameDurbin brianGeorge floydMazie hironoSheldon whitehouseBader ginsburgKevin stuckeyBooker jesseAmy coneyFreedom court