Hearing, you can watch it online at cspan. Org, as we take you live to the house gaveling back in. For what purpose does the gentleman from arkansas rise . Mr. Hill mr. Speaker, i do now move the house adjourn. The speaker pro tempore the question is on the motion to adjourn. So many as are in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. The ayes have it. The motion is adopted. Accordingly the house stands adjourned until noon tomorrow. With that, the house has gone out of session for the day. Back tomorrow at noon for potentially another speaker vote. Two votes have been held with jim jordan as the republican nominee. 20 dissenters in the first vote. 22 in the second vote. According to paul kaine of the washington post, jordan set a modern record, lowest vote tally for majoritys nominee to be speaker, just 199 republicans voted for him on the second ballot. No majority nominee has received less than 200 votes in a really long time. Mccarthys lowest tally was 200 a couple of times in january. So
Speaker. That says a lot about where we are right now. Lets look at you were one of the eight who voted to vacate, kick Kevin Mccarthy out of the speakers chair. You just heard Congressman Gimenez talking to jake saying he wants mccarthy back. Is there any chance youll have A Change Of Heart . Im not going to vote for Kevin Mccarthy. As carlos also said, we have 221 members, were going to find someone to move forward. Even if its a temporary basis, but we will find somebody so that we can get our work done. What happens now . Well, right now, folks are going into conference, theres going to be a lot of yelling and screaming. I will go into conference, after it settles down a little bit. And i think we come up with either the 30day plan. Or jim wants to go back to the floor for a second vote. If we get a second vote, is going to lose some votes on the first vote. And hes going to gain some votes. But i anticipate the vote will still be in that 15 to 25 range. Was the 20 votes effectivel
Events. But she still has nightmares and dont know where her mom is at right now. And thats not the only person that she doesnt know where shes at right now because her aunt, caramel, which was playing with her all weekend and every time, and every minute she was in the kibbutz, she was coming to play. And their grandmother that died, but we are not telling her because thats not something that she can take for the moment. And she was really connected to her as well. Were a really close family. I know you are. And would you stay in touch, i know we had connective problems from your end, but would you stay in touch. Were out of time on our show, but please let us know and well talk to you we hope with better news. Thank you. Thank you very much. We want to bring them back, and we want women and children first. Anyone that see this need to remember its a human thing. Its not a war between two sides. Its a human matter. We need to bring back the girls and the children first. After that the
Social security is my lifeline. Is my lifeline to remaining an independent person and being able to live my life, happily. Those of us who have worked all our lives and paid into Social Security expect Social Security to be there because we paid into it. Not a gift. We earned it. Its Household Finances and it goes into the checkbook and its use for every day Living Expenses. It will have a Significant Impact on our life because we want to run her house and does well is to do other things in retirement. That would be a serious cut in our income. Please welcome are chief executive officer joanne jenkins. [applause] cemented morning and welcome to this bipartisan discussion about the future of Social Security. We are honored today to hear from to congressional leaders who have put forth ideas to save and protect Social Security. Republican senator dell cassidy from louisiana and democratic congressman john lawson who represents the First District of connecticut. As a lookout over this roo
nicolle wallace. with the stroke of a pen and just a handful of words, a former president of the united states once again under a gag order, intended to curb the damaging effects of his rhetoric. the court of appeals in new york has attempted to remove that gag order in the $250 million civil fraud trial gwens him, his family and his business, the trump organization. the according to rejecting the argument put forward by his attorneys that the gag order was unconstitutional. that means donald trump and his attorneys ared prohibited from making public statements about the staff of judge arthur engoron. the decision by the appeals court had come in while court wasession. the judge let trump attorneys know the gag order was back in effect and said, o quote, i intd to enforce the gag orders rigorously and vigorously, and i want to make sure the counsel informs their client the fact that the stay was vacated. according to abc news, chris kise replied. we re aware. it s a tragic da