formalising that. it was a waiver keir starmer i think of trying to publicly draw the line between the party underjeremy corbyn s leadership and the party under his leadership and the party under his leadership it was a way for keir starmer. it was very clear that it was about electoral chances and that he felt that allowing jeremy corbyn to stand as a labour candidate next time would diminish the electoral chances of the party but as you referenced, jeremy corbyn still has a number of supporters in the labour party and that has been a pretty divisive in that regard, and the campaign group momentum, that backed jeremy corbyn s leadership, described this as a venal act from keir starmer, and jeremy corbyn himself talked about keir starmer denigrating the democratic foundations of the party. no response since the vote yet but we