Term understanding of the corridor and i think that with her many years in the Richmond District and also along the whole corridor and accountable many members of the Planning Association for the richmond and others that participate in their very well atebded meetings every month. And i think that she will bring a strong voice on her own behalf and many from the Richmond District. He has been taking transit daily as well and lives in the central richmond area. And he really tried to be here, but there was an emergency that he could not attend, and i know that as a San Francisco state employee, and also taking the east and west routes like the 38 geary and other lines as well. But i think that he will bring a tremendous point of view. And a neighborhood organizations as well as a district one rep and a transit rider and a neighborhood activist as well. And so i am going to recommend margie brown for the at large seat. And recommend jonathan forester for the 61 seat as well. Comments . C
Reserve and that will again, partially fund the construction phase and we plan to work with mta to continue to identify funding for the construction phase which is the phase to start in july of 2015. Do you have the slide that outlines the recommendations. No, but the project solutions and if you do want to look in the packet, you can view the evaluation of the project, on attachment, let me see. And it is i think, i actually have it, and it is attachment four. And if you look and then our recommendations i believe, are encompassed within attachment five could you summarize what the recommendations are. So the recommendation is to fund about a Million Dollars 1. 045 million to the mccallister Street Project. And that is within, the confines of woods and larkin in district six and then to fund, 365,000 and if we are precise, 364,000 to the webster street, and it is an sfmta project and the other is hastings and you may recall that we funded a earlier phase of the work, and the construct
Total, 5 sponsoring agency and so maybe these projects. On this slide, you can view that the project locations of these projects as they are spread, throughout the city. Now this terms of our evaluation of these projects, we evaluated them based off of the information that was submitted in their applications. And also, by applying the adopted criteria and we first, degree the projects for the eligibility, and then we compared them against category specific, and program wide prioritization criteria and in addition to this existing prior station criteria, we wanted to ad mere to the prop a mandate to deliver benefits to the public, by prioritizing the projects that were able to initiate this work in this current year and also the projects in light of the vision zero resolutions that were recently introduced by the board of supervisors earlier this year. We are recommended a Million Dollars to the mccal ter project and 360,000 for the signals project and for a total of 1. 41 million which
Additional funds, a little less than a million could be available from the San Francisco city colleges, and feeling like the pedestrian connector project, which was struggling in the face of city colleges ongoing accreditation issues, and we have been working with the others in the city college, of course to see how this project could still be implemented at this point, it looks like mta may assume responsible for implementation of this project. And along with its adjacent pedestrian plaza project and the details are still being sorted out and we expect additional, we hope for resolution in the next fao months and we will keep the commissioners apprised of that project progress, but due to its future looking more often, and there was only a Million Dollars available to this call for projects. On the slide before you, you can see and also on the attachment three of your packet, you can view a summary of the applications that we received in response to the call for project and on attachm
For projects. On the slide before you, you can see and also on the attachment three of your packet, you can view a summary of the applications that we received in response to the call for project and on attachment four you can see a listing of these projects and the corresponding scores and we received a total of 6 project commissioner and five pedestrian and safety and response to the call and requesting about five million in the prop a funds, and the total available funding at this time which was 1. 15 million, total, 5 sponsoring agency and so maybe these projects. On this slide, you can view that the project locations of these projects as they are spread, throughout the city. Now this terms of our evaluation of these projects, we evaluated them based off of the information that was submitted in their applications. And also, by applying the adopted criteria and we first, degree the projects for the eligibility, and then we compared them against category specific, and program wide pr