the other crime described a black nissan. this is the same type of vehicle and size and shape. and most likely in the same era of 80s or 90s or 2,000. you don t pay too much attention to the make and model. this vehicle ran into the vehicle s vehicle and might have left something on the rod way. a head light or tail light or marker of trim from the vehicle. so we don t know what they know, but certainly a victim under stress is not going to be 100 percent on the vehicle make and model and color. lighting changes the color. more lighting is more obvious. and some change in street lamps and highway lamps and so they need to get an mo connection with another crime or find the vehicle and that is one reason
that out of nothing but rage. when that officer starts bashing in the window of that car, he went from being a professional law enforcement officer dealing with a frustrating situation to an angry man with a gun. ferrell starts to drive off while another officer fires at the minivan full of kids as young as 6. what you just saw was a completely unconstitutional use of deadly force. when somebody s leaving the scene of an incident, trying to fire at the vehicle make is s n sense at all. the officer said he was firing at the tires. perhaps even a marine sniper would have difficulty hitting tires. her moeks and her errors don t excuse the officer s callous disregard for the ages of the kids in the back of that car. police work is a lot of ambiguity. this is not ambiguous. on friday, the officer who fired his gun was fired. here s another look at the action that proceeded that shooting. this traffic stop is going to go one of two ways, okay?