disrupt or control the united states network. the house intelligence committee is pushing two chinese telecoms for documents on their vat joy, and connections to the communist party. even if the companies are clean and legitimate today, can they withstand the pressure from the chinese government tomorrow if the chinese government wants them to be participants in back door cyber attack? 40 percent of some employees are members of the communist party and the leaders who are now leading the company used to be in the chinese military. come on. and a company that makes hand sets confirmed a back door on an droid smartphones. shepard: any response from the companies? reporter: a spokesman for one company said that the quality and security of their solutions are world proven, in over 140 countries by over 500 operators and those that purport
hydra and the middle east is more dangerous an ever. dave: it is hypocritical when you go back in time, the immediate aftermath of the killing of ben bin and the president said, we will not attempt to spike the football. is it doing just that? guest: well, i think it does seem to be that way and in this election year, unfortunately, what happens, as many in the muslim world see if america will defend those searching for freedom and do the right thing but looks as if it is a political reason and in this political season it is used in an exploited matter rather than doing what is right and unifying us from the left and the right and the white house has not risen above that and is not laying out the strategy. the people of syria and many of those fighting for freedom have to see the president to say, well, possibly waiting for elections rather than doing what is right. here, again, the ad is spiking football rather than saying what our vat joy is and being nonpartisan in the battle.
more to it than that, but, obviously, it is the whole event, the whole . what is it? guest: everything. when you go, first of all a lot of our fans have the headsets on and they listen to the vat joy the strategy between the driver. who will pit when? who is running better? all the strategy. and they are engaged. so, that is another thing for us in technology, the technology is helping us bring our fans closer to nascar. neil: it is a big personality business, too. guest: it is. neil: so, who do you bank on? guest: you bank on who wins. and who takes or captures the big prize. danna will be in the daytona on, which is good for us and looking forward to her competing and we came off of a great season, our most dramatic playoff run we
sample, you did the test, and the result came back negative. that is correct. but the prosecution suggesting that doesn t prove a thing about whether somebody drugged caylee. it doesn t mean the person wasn t given the drug or that they were,ist just doesn t mean anything. guest: it means that i did not find any evidence of the drug having been given, correct. but it still could have been given and not shown up in the hair? all thank you is correct, hair not the best sample. so determining whether someone was given a drug or not, a negative result doesn t answer that question? no, it does not. if someone were exposed to something and died immediately or very closely it wouldn t appear the hair anyway? that is correct. the witness said she could not test for chloroform. the defense doesn t appear to be scoring any major points but according to the courtroom observer, but the vat joy is to make the case that this is