be sore. it reports that his conduct was not abusive and sense of the behaviour that was intended or specifically targeted. making a key distinction. it talks about dominic raab being able to regulate this kind of abrasive nature. we also have examples here and if i take you to the next page. and we can see here. it says, i found that the deputy prime minister s connor cannot be characterised as offensive, malicious or insulting. it was experience is intimidating in the sense of excessively demanding and i could not make a finding as to whether it was in fact intimidating in the sense. there was no evidence to suggest any abuse or misuse of power. also, if we go down to the next page, we can see here that we are talking again about intimidating behaviour. unreasonably and persistently aggressive conduct in a work meeting. and here we can see that he complained that he needed staff to be giving him the basic information and when he was unhappy with what they were givi
chalk is replacement. mex. in the last couple of minutes. alex chalk is replacement. in the last couple of minutes. alex chalk is replacement. alex chalk is well liked, he chalk is replacement. alex chalk is well liked, he has chalk is replacement. alex chalk is well liked, he has a chalk is replacement. alex chalk is well liked, he has a slim majority l well liked, he has a slim majority in cheltenham but he has been in the department before having served in a variety ofjunior mr wilson s 2020. he was the minister after rishi sunak became prime so you will know the department while which might serve him well but then dominic raab knew the department well but that didn t stop what seems to be a coordinated number of civil servants aiming to force him out. let’s aiming to force him out. let s stick with aiming to force him out. let s stick with dominic aiming to force him out. let s stick with dominic raab - aiming to force him out. let s stick with dominic raab then. l aimi