roll it and say, i m going to leave it to a jury to decide whether donald trump is guilty or not. yikes. kyle, i wanna talk about illegal validators that you have unfortunately, pay but we have to cover for months and months. people who refused to respond to subpoenas for the general six committee. now that the committees basically done, what have missiles potential witnesses? these things are over done. with the lawyers who represent them, they re the ones who win? a fact, oblique yes. the committee for all of the work, the amount of work they ve been able to do, had limited capacity. they had only so many legal bellagio is that they could engage. they chose early on to pursue the important to get trump himself, against mark meadows. i guess the rnc. and others. they couldn t tackle every single subpoena that came their way. there was a number. they punted implanted implanted. some of the big got lucky. one of them was by accident.
analyst, and the ceo of the nevada independent. and john micek joins us, he s in pennsylvania, and editor in chief of the pennsylvania capital star. peter, let s turn to you first, the polls open an hours, we found his closing message. this is not meant to be a referendum on himself, maybe unhappy with me as president, he s saying, because inflation rather issues. but the choice is the radical republicans, he s arguing, it will take things backwards, in a lot of ways. particularly on issues of economics focusing on, on issues of abortion, on issues of culture. but also really on democracy, right? the argument is that the election deniers on the ballot, the validators of donald trump, will undercut the system that americans had the last couple hundred years. and it s not a message that has, you know, resonated with crowds
republicans, he s arguing, it will take things backwards, in a lot of ways. particularly on issues of economics focusing on, on issues of abortion, on issues of culture. but also really on democracy, right? the argument is that the election deniers on the ballot, the validators of donald trump, will undercut the system that americans had the last couple hundred years. and it s not a message that has, you know, resonated with crowds beyond core democrats, according to polls, the momentum democrats had a few weeks ago slowed, and reversed over the past few days. he s trying to turn it around with a pretty active schedule
actually, if that s progressive, then put that title on me. i would wear it. but the fact that he does have some issues in his past that he has refused and been too stubborn to acknowledge and apologize for, particularly the incident with the young black man. i m not beating a dead horse. this is an issue in the primary that he needs to say something about. that is an impediment i think to dr. oz cuts into that more than the social butterfly. dr. oz has name recognition. he has name recognition and he has validators. i didn t expect to name-drop oprah, but he has validators. he has oprah. and by no means do they speak for the african american community, but he will have the ability to cut into a base than you think that dr. mehmet oz will cut into the base because of oprah? oprah does not support the doctor. or dampen the turnout. oprah doesn t support dr. oz. it doesn t matter. my point is that that is the relationship that people understand him and know him from. that s