Risk. Justice alito well, an offense that prohibits the possession of the sawedoff shotgun has an element. So youd have to decide whether that element creates the 13 risk. I do not see a vessel said. Menendez under my solution, were possession of a shark barrel shotgun would not count under minnesota law because it does not wear the position in connection with behavior that creates a risk. Justice scalia but the jury would have found the fact of the risk menendez precisely, your honor. Justice scalia in the in the cases that you are describing . Menendez in my imagined solution, your honor. But frankly it is up to congress. Justice kagan so so what youre saying essentially is that all the statutes in the back of the government would count . Menendez yes, your honor. Justice kagan but nothing else would. In other words you have to have a listen specifically and this conduct created a serious risk of injury. Menendez if congress chose that as a solution, yes your honor. I think this demo
Good morning, the publisher of burlington court. Five years into the common core we are at a critical juncture. Common cores added alltime low it has dwindled from 26 states and from washington d. C. To seven states to washington dc. It is really no longer viable. In fact, the other national is not doing much better. It is true better. It is true to say there is Little Common purpose or competent ability left in common core. This volume that we are releasing this morning, drilling through the core is definitely a timely release. Five years into this Great American education today, it is worth remembering what we are debating. It is not politics, whether the debate of a contest between two distinct views. The first is that the common core standards are a state driven effort to improve k12 Public Education and especially to help children in underperforming districts. The second is that they are from dubious quality and what is historically legally, and financially as state and local issu
Hypothetical. Why does mortgage credit enable them both equally . Im not sure how were going to do that. So rather than seeing a reform with much tighter regulations, limits on what their executives can make, with an acceptable rate of return and this make whatever you can and get rich structure, its about the famous line from winston churchill, it seems like its working until you consider the alternatives. I guess ive become an advocate of fixing what we have and recognizing that its not perfect. There are dangers in that system. There are dangers in every system. There is another side of false dichotomy with private capital. Fannie and freddie had to be bailed out by the government so we fix that now with dodd frank, if the big bank controls the Mortgage Market, one that undo everything weve done . Why is that private capital . So if we did that and we let franny and freddie start to build capital again and we release them into the market, do you feel there is any risk that we will h
Sturges, the publish of drilling through the core. Five years into the debate over common core we are at a critical juncture. It is shown to have the lowest approvals and it has dwindled from 26 states and washington to seven states and washington, d. C. It is no longer viable actually. Tests are not doing better. It is true to say there is Little Common purpose left in common core. So this volume we are releasing this morning, drilling through the core, is definitely a timely release. But five years into the this Great American education debate it is worth remembering what we are debating. It is not politics. But the debate is a contest between two distinct views. The first is common core standards are a state effort to improve k12 education and help children in under performing districts. The second view is the common core standard are of dubious academic quality and is a state and local issue. Drilling through the core is a book that strives to treat the first view fairly but argue
What happened at the Common Core Forum in Carson City on 1/13/15 The ground rules agreed to by both sides for the two forums: two people would participate on each side of the issue.