especially in countries that have a limited supply before we start thinking about children who generally do not get seriously ill? again the debate about us versus other countries. other countries. massive debate about this even other countries. massive debate about this even amongst - other countries. massive debate about this even amongst senior| about this even amongst senior scientist and andrew pollard, one of the men behind the oxford astrazeneca jab, he has got some strong views on this, and he says we are morally wrong to be vaccinating young people in this country who have a low risk of serious disease while there are people in other countries with a much higher risk you can t have a vaccine, but another view held by other scientist which is, if you look at how many millions and millions of doses might be needed around the world, the 1.4 million young 16 and 17 year olds in this country that might get the vaccine as a result, they are going to be a very small part of that h
years old, teenagers and all parts of the uk could be offered the jab as early as next week. parents will be asked to give their consent, they were a child can make the final decision if a doctorfinds decision if a doctor finds them competent. t decision if a doctor finds them competent- decision if a doctor finds them competent. i think it will really hel me competent. i think it will really help me and competent. i think it will really help me and the competent. i think it will really help me and the people - competent. i think it will really | help me and the people around competent. i think it will really i help me and the people around me if i try and stay as safe as possible. one person will say it is not safe, another one person will say it is not safe, another will one person will say it is not safe, another will say it is. quite contradictory. | another will say it is. quite contradictory. another will say it is. quite contradictory. another will say it is. quite contr
i think most people will see the logic of matt, who has said he did wrong, and he did do wrong, no question, he accepted that and acknowledged it and that s why he apologised. we are in the middle of a pandemic, something he has huge experience in dealing with, phenomenal success with the vaccine role that and he and the prime minister wanted to deliver on that. that doesn t change the fact that it s quite understandable, and i think with hindsight after 2a hours matt took the decision that his position distracted from the position he was focusing on. after 2a hours of bad headlines and more bad headlines to come. straightforward question, who has more control over the cabinet? the prime minister or the sun newspaper? we all serve at the pleasure of the prime minister and we work as a team, and the reality is matt took the view that his position was distracting from that important work and he wants to put his children s thoughts in his mind as well, as he rightly should, but also think
apologised. we are in the middle of a pandemic, something he has huge experience in dealing with, phenomenal success with the vaccine role that and he and the prime minister wanted to deliver on that. that doesn t change the fact that it s quite understandable, and i think after 2a hours matt took the decision that his position distracted from the position he was focusing on. distracted from the position he was focusing on- focusing on. after headlines and more bad headlines focusing on. after headlines and more bad headlines to focusing on. after headlines and more bad headlines to come. i more bad headlines to come. straightforward question, who has more control over the cabinet? the prime minister or the sun newspaper? we all serve at the pleasure of the prime minister and we work as a team, and the reality is matt took the decision that his position was distracting from that important work and he wants to put his children s thoughts in his mind as well, as he rightly should, b
improve their bridges and improve their commute to work at mac had a thing you can give them a vaccine role in programme in the coronavirus or a stimulus package that puts money into the pockets then will overcome some of these divisions amongst themselves and they will have a sense of common purpose or at least some sense of trust in government. i wonder if there is any evidence that that is true or whether the emotions that fuel these cultural divides override economic benefits from government. i cultural divides override economic benefits from government.- benefits from government. i don t think we have benefits from government. i don t think we have any benefits from government. i don t think we have any way benefits from government. i don t think we have any way of - benefits from government. i don t think we have any way of knowing | benefits from government. i don t . think we have any way of knowing yet because think we have any way of knowing yet because government has